You left out “Willingness of cultists to actually admit reliability problems.”
Another delusionary comment from a Apple Hate Brigade member. . .
In other words, every single report of Apple reliability from Consumer Reports, to ZDNet, to PCWorld, to JD Power, is ALL fraud by Apple Cultist's fraud and conspiracy. WOW! Hundreds of millions of people are deluded into thinking their Apple devices keep on working when they are actually broken and not working. . . lying dead on their desks or in their pockets.
Which is it? Bolobaby is deluded or hundreds of millions of Apple users are unwilling to admit that their devices are broken and dead, deluding themselves? Occam's Razor seems to cut this only one way. Go to the barber and get shaved, Bolobaby.
Incidentally, IBM is weighing in on this. They are finding that they need only 1 tech person to provide support for 5,375 Apple device users. . . while they need 1 tech support person for every 70 Windows device users. That's quite a dichotomy.
IBM tech support also found that only 5% of the workforce using Apple Macs needed tech support while 40% of the Windows PC users need tech support during the same time frame. They also found that 98.7% of Mac issues could be handled on the first call, not so for for the PC calls.
IBM is rapidly deploying Macs at the rate of 1,900 - 2,000 a week.
Fletcher Previn, IBM VP of Workplace-as-a-Service said, "Every Mac that we buy is making and saving IBM money."
I am sure you have all kinds of data to back up your comment which indicates you believe that Macs are not as reliable as stated from a hardware perspective, but only seem that way because the data has been scrubbed clean.
How is it that Apple can scrub its data, but Dell or any number of laptop vendors can’t?
I am interested in hearing your views on this...you aren’t playing the part of a “Seagull Poster”, are you?