Look at the sourcing. There is no evidence presented, only speculation.
Speculation; and not well written. Thus, it meanders off into a convoluted slam of Columbus. It all smacks of nonsense.
“Look at the sourcing. There is no evidence presented, only speculation.”
Exactly. For example they present no evidence that “red boots” killed Jake, yet they are sure that he did. Its a pretty useless article.
Evidence. Let me think. Who has the evidence?
And since when did asking questions become a bad thing?
And what "sourcing" meets your standard? Are you quite satisfied with how the msm has reported this story?
And when a gag order is imposed (overturned and then quickly reimposed) don't you get at least a little curious?