Posted on 11/20/2015 7:08:20 AM PST by rktman
Gun control is a powder keg of an issue anyway, but selecting an individual as spokesman that reasonable people agree should never be allowed to own a gun, only makes the effort more prone to misfire.
And thatâs exactly what happened in Virginia.
Democrats are convinced the next election is always going to be the one where âgun controlâ pays off. Except it doesnât: Election after election after election this favorite issue is a dud at the ballot box. Bitter clingers always manage to out-vote eager grabbers.
The problem is particularly acute in offâyear, nonpresidential elections. Making gun controlâs appearance in Virginiaâs legislative races even more puzzling. The Democratic base is composed of a significant number of voters that arenât ideologically motivated.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
One guess.
A few hundred million guns in the US and the biggest buying spree ever seen....... I’m guessing there a are more dem gun owners than we realize and I’ll bet most didn’t buy all these guns just to have their use over-regulated.
But, inserting liblogic, it’s easy to see that, had the “targets” been armed, the death tolls would have been much higher proving once again that strict gun control actually saves lives. Or something.
To show the law is not racist or biased, Andy Parker should serve about 60 days in the slammer for his threats, and be placed in the same cell as Vester Lee Flanagan II so they can discuss why people like Alison should not be able to possess a gun, something they both agree on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.