What is most surprising is that many “scientists” are convinced that there is absolutely no chance of there being a divinity.
Interestingly, just 100 years ago scientists thought that they had “it all figured out” and had the world and nature pegged. Fast-forward to modern times and it is clear that their concept of the world was very limited and grossly incorrect. What is even stranger is that modern science is heading off into directions that are so abstract that there is very little connection to our perception of “reality” and what our senses tell us about the world. How much will our scientific perception of the world change in another 100 years?
As for the idea of a God. Many people argue that humanity’s concept of deity is derived from the fact that we all see a hierarchy in nature. That is, we see organisms smaller and less complex than ourselves and so we infer that there must be something bigger even more complex than ourselves and that something must have created us. I suggest that the concept of a God is deeper than that. That there some fundamental “force” or “connection” that gives us the concept of a God. Just my opinion.
Bottom line: As we stumble clumsily along trying to understand a nature through science and the scientific process, we should be humbled by the fact that there is so little that we know and understand.
That's true. As perhaps you're aware, as indicated by your 100-year time-frame, what actually happened was that Edwin Hubble debunked their theory of an eternal universe when he discovered that our universe had an actual beginning, the Big Bang--or better, the Cosmic Creation Event.
There's an interesting dichotomy among scientists. Astronomers, who look back in time, are almost universally deists if not also theists, because they now realize that the universe's beginning required a transcendant Beginner. Biologists, who look at current and recent times, are mainly atheistic or agnostic, because they are studying that part of creation since God stopped creating new species (we're still in the Seventh Day), so they observe no direct current evidence of creation and draw the wrong conclusion.
I suggest that the concept of a God is deeper than that. That there some fundamental “force” or “connection” that gives us the concept of a God.
His name is the Holy Spirit, Who witnesses to each of us in a way best suited to us individually. God has implanted an eternal spirit in each of us, which is what distinguishes us from all other animals, and one of its components is our conscience. CS Lewis wrote eloquently and accessibly about this in his classic, Mere Christianity. Additionally, creation testifies for itself about God:
"...what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse." (Romans 1:19b-20)
Bottom line: As we stumble clumsily along trying to understand a nature through science and the scientific process, we should be humbled by the fact that there is so little that we know and understand.
We should certainly be humble, primarily about the fact that we do not measure up to God's standard of perfection. Although we do have much more to learn about our universe, we do already know enough about God and how to please Him (through faith--see my tagline), because He has made it His mission to inform us, generally as above and specifically through His Word and His Son.