See 76
At first, I accepted without question that the image of the baby was the correct image. I figured the early reports had the age wrong (age 3).
But, then I saw that one comment at Conservative Treehouse.
Now that I look at the video again, the child in the video does look bigger, more like a 3-year-old. The reports must be correct. This other image is of a baby. Notice the fine baby hair (so cute!). And the pacifier.
The question is, how did this photo become the image presented as the child in the video? Who knows...