Two NYT Reporters Posted Darren Wilson’s Home Address. Look Here To See THEIR Home Addresses

CLASH DAILY ^ | NOV 26, 2014 | CLASH DAILY

[SWAMPSNIPER]

If anything happens to Wilson and/or his home and it can be traced back to the NYT’s posting of his address should they be held liable? Maybe, we should publish the writer’s address as well. See how that toad likes it.

[vladimir998]

I hate to say it, but if something happened to these reporters or their families or homes then no average joe in America would have to worry about his address appearing in a newspaper under similar circumstances again. That’s the only way liberals learn.

[RBW in PA]

I keep saying that all those who are responsible for the destruction should be living in fear.

[Lee'sGhost]

Was Michael Brown guilty?
Hands down!

[Gaffer]

I wholly believe that. They all think they are above the fray and immune. They should get what they give or induce.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

Everyone should play by the same rules.

[Steve_Seattle]

I believe that posting home addresses of persons caught up in public controversy is a violation of journalistic ethics. But it’s a tactic that has become quite common on the Left in recent years.

[defconw]

BTTT!

[dfwgator]

1060 W Addison St, Chicago, IL 60613

[Ray76]

To make a point of it I’d have posted aerial and street views.

[ScottinVA]

Who here believes Michael Brown was guilty? Hands up!

[olepap]

Excellent tactic, in my opinion.
Tit for tat is the best approach, as has been proven in Game Theory.

[PGR88]

Did Spike Lee teach them nothing?

[Revelation 911]

“that’s Wrigley field”

[skeeter]

Somewhere out there are two NYT libturd reporters with tightly puckering spinchters.

Hilarious.

[Ray76]

Yeah yeah.

[Lizavetta]

I saw what you did there. :)

[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

And Uber is going after the media, too. I like this trend. Yes, they have a right to free speech, but not freedom from all consequences of their malfeasance.

[wally_bert]

I put that down when I falsified my renewal.