So, basically you believe all of them are lying to cover their own ass for some real or concerning screwup on their individual parts; but, conversely you believe they are NOT lying about some role they may have had in a plot to kill Fuddy because you further believe there was no such plot....correct?
If that’s an accurate assessment of your thoughts, I will buy that for now because, as Schultz said, “I know nothing”!!!!
They’re lyinq because they were told it was necessary to protect Fuddy, in my view based on all the evidence I have.
There was not a plot to murder Fuddy. There was a plot to staqe her death so they could whisk her away under a new identity, supposedly in order to protect her - a “potential state witness”.
That’s why HRS 841-3 was not in effect. There was NO DEATH within a HI county’s jurisdiction.
The real purpose was to keep her from ever beinq able to testify after the CCP reveals what they’ve qot. HI statute does not allow the HI AG to hide a witness so that they CAN’T testify - only to protect them so they CAN. Faking a death eliminates the possibility of the “witness” ever testifying so the HI statute in question does NOT justify the orders that David Louie most likely gave to the HI agencies in question, to fake the death of Loretta Fuddy.
Before anybody writes this off as nuts, please remember that a couple dozen Benghazi witnesses were given new identities. I have communicated with those who do the “extractions” of operatives who endanger a “mission” - includinq the ways they fake deaths. I know this happens. The MCPD says there was no death within their jurisdiction, even though they initially opened up a case because the claimed circumstances WOULD be under their jurisdiction if Fuddy was actually dead. You’ll never guess when they changed their mind and said there actually WASN’T a death under their jurisdiction...
There is much more to come, and those who immediately write this off as crazy WILL end up with egg on their face, so I advise you not to be one of them.