Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Scoutmaster

I agree with what you’re saying. It amazes me when I hear a 1930s Martin D-18. The guitars are light, but extremely powerful and easy to see why Doc Watson, Kenny Smith and many other’s use them for recording. There’s an interesting posting on UMGF by a guy who is comparing his guitars. See: http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/topic/137995/1936-D18-vs-2011-D18-Authentic

He weighed his D-18 Authentic 1937 (made in 2011) vs his actual 1936 Martin D-18. There was a 5 oz weight difference between them. 5 oz!!! The older being lighter, yet it has the more fuller sound.

I assume it’s the shrinking of the glue, the drying of the wood etc. This comes only with time.


32 posted on 09/23/2014 9:59:37 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: nikos1121
Vintage D-18s are my favorite old Martins and one of my favorite guitars overall.

Given a choice, however, I'll take a late 40s-early 50s Gibson J-45 or Southern Jumbo (the same guitar, but with a Grand Ole Opry pimp factor). It has more of an 'Americana Sound' and you feel the low notes in your gut.

One thing that helps the sound is that the nitrocellulose lacquer finish becomes harder and thinner with age. The wood also ages more for some years, and I think all the vibrations simply loosen the guitar so it can vibrate more. All I know is, it makes a difference, and I think it makes more of a difference with mahogany soundwood than maple or rosewood. That's just my opinion.

40 posted on 09/23/2014 12:16:15 PM PDT by Scoutmaster (I'd rather be at Philmont)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson