Skip to comments.
Papyrus Referring to Jesus’ Wife Is More Likely Ancient Than Fake, Scientists Say
NY Slimes ^
| 4/10/2014
| Laurie Goodstein
Posted on 04/10/2014 1:54:14 PM PDT by mojito
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
It's just a miracle how things that confirm everything that liberals know is true are somehow confirmed by the "authority" of science.
Actually, although I'm not an expert on ancient papyrii, I believe that the text will be found to read not "Jesus said to them ""My wife....""; but rather, "Jesus said the them, ""My lesbian wife...."
And I was told this by the Archbishop of Canterbury. I swear.
1
posted on
04/10/2014 1:54:14 PM PDT
by
mojito
To: mojito
It could just be a really old blasphemy
2
posted on
04/10/2014 1:55:31 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: mojito
The science is settled, don't you know?
4
posted on
04/10/2014 1:56:56 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket)
To: mojito
Wow, you would think Easter was coming up soon or something.
5
posted on
04/10/2014 1:57:20 PM PDT
by
Andyman
(The truth shall make you FReep.)
To: mojito
Harvard Divinity School historian in 2012, has been tested by scientists who conclude in a journal published on Thursday that the ink and papyrus are very likely ancient, and not a modern forgery An ancient forgery, not a modern forgery. Truth has a hard time surviving at Harvard.
6
posted on
04/10/2014 1:58:08 PM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: mojito
Anything to spread doubt and misleading information, thats for sure.
7
posted on
04/10/2014 1:58:19 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: GeronL
Certainly possible.
The fragment was dated to the 4th to 8th century, so it could very well be some wild gnostic nonsense of the time, rather than the gnostic nonsense of today. However, and science notwithstanding, I still suspect the later.
8
posted on
04/10/2014 1:58:59 PM PDT
by
mojito
(Zero, our Nero.)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: mojito
10
posted on
04/10/2014 1:59:46 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: mojito
‘Jesus’ (Yeshu or Yeshua see Chronicles II 31:15) was a common name in those days.
11
posted on
04/10/2014 1:59:56 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(Obama is the biggest joke. But I can't laugh.)
To: mojito
Many people were named Jesus.
12
posted on
04/10/2014 2:00:12 PM PDT
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: mojito
Let's see... Should I believe the Bible... or the New York Times?
One is a work of fiction, created by men with a political agenda, and unsubstantiated by facts.
The other is The Word of God.
13
posted on
04/10/2014 2:00:25 PM PDT
by
Fido969
(What's sad is most)
To: mojito
Written by a crack-pot. There have always been crack-pots and will always be crack-pots. This was written a long time ago by a crack-pot.
14
posted on
04/10/2014 2:00:39 PM PDT
by
Justice
To: mojito
“Jesus didn’t really exist, wasn’t really crucified, wasn’t resurrected, but He had a wife...” < /liberal left >
15
posted on
04/10/2014 2:01:04 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
To: mojito
Any Bible scholars or practicing Jews: Wouldn’t a rabbi have to have a wife to be taken seriously, or am I misunderstanding the practices back then?
16
posted on
04/10/2014 2:02:08 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
To: mojito
It's just a miracle how things that confirm everything that liberals know is true are somehow confirmed by the "authority" of science.Is there anything in this new papyrus about Jesus leaving the seat down or not taking out the garbage?
17
posted on
04/10/2014 2:02:10 PM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: mojito
Knocking the Catholic religion seems to be common before Easter and Christmas. The gnostic gospels were thrown out because they were about 200-300 years after Jesus. So they were ancient, but it would be like me writing George Washington’s ‘autobiography’.
19
posted on
04/10/2014 2:03:07 PM PDT
by
wattsgnu
To: a fool in paradise
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson