To: Morgana
I’ve not followed this news story at all. What action/comment/event led to the ‘affluenza’ appellation?
To: posterchild
That is their way of saying he’s a spoiled rich kid.
3 posted on
03/18/2014 7:42:48 PM PDT by
Morgana
(Wagglebee please come home we miss you!)
To: posterchild
Couchs attorneys argued his parents were responsible for the teens actions that night because of the way he had been raised. Defense attorneys put a psychologist on the stand who testified Couch was a product of wealth and got whatever he wanted.
4 posted on
03/18/2014 7:44:20 PM PDT by
Abby4116
To: posterchild
Defense expert said he was suffering from the effects of too much wealth and leisure ("affluenza") and therefore he was not responsible for his actions.
The judge agreed and made sure he didn't do any time.
I'm glad that one family refused the money.
6 posted on
03/18/2014 7:52:42 PM PDT by
wideawake
To: posterchild
Affluenza = The new Twinkie Defense
9 posted on
03/18/2014 7:56:39 PM PDT by
dfwgator
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson