So, does the State of CA claim it, or the thief's heirs?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: BunnySlippers
No, these were stashed as obtained, I believe the stasher obtained at least the early ones from “free coinage” and was a miner or mine owner/shareholder.
36 posted on
02/26/2014 8:41:47 PM PST by
Axenolith
(Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
To: BunnySlippers
Uncle Dimmick left me those coins in his will. If that story won’t fly, I can make up another.
To: BunnySlippers
Am I the only 1 who sees some wrong math here?
“500 coins were stolen by Dimmick - only 73 coins less than the 1,427”
Huh? I’d say that’s a HUGE mismatch.
46 posted on
02/26/2014 8:56:03 PM PST by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
To: BunnySlippers
I knew the state of California would figure out a way to get their hands on that treasure. Idiots should have kept their mouths shut and moved to Texas.
They could have then ‘dug up’ their treasure on their new ranch in the middle of nowhere, and no one would have been the wiser. Watch and see if they aren’t screwed out of the whole lot.
56 posted on
02/26/2014 9:36:53 PM PST by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: BunnySlippers
"nearly all dating from 1847 to 1894" Why would the San Francisco mint have any gold coins dated 1847? That does not pass the smell test.
To: BunnySlippers
Doesn't the U.S. Treasury own and operate the U.S. Mint? If these coins were stolen from the SF Mint in CA, the
U.S. Treasury would take ownership of the coins, NOT THE STATE OR ANY CIVILIAN HEIRS!
It's quite possible Dimmick stole more than the SF Mint THOUGHT he stole, and that might account for the difference in quantity/type stolen vs. that found.
To: BunnySlippers
61 posted on
02/26/2014 10:27:25 PM PST by
gunsequalfreedom
(Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
To: BunnySlippers
No way to tell how this will pan out eventually but you can bet the farm that a LOT of people including a bunch of .gov assclowns are looking for ways to
separate this couple from the coins by any means possible.
To: BunnySlippers
The face value of the Saddle Ridge Hoard, as theyve called it, added up to about $27,000,
Back then US gold coins had a face value of $20. So going by today's prices this $27,000 in gold coins is worth about 1.4 million
dollars just goin by weight not rariety
68 posted on
02/27/2014 1:55:07 AM PST by
dennisw
(The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
To: BunnySlippers
of course; any/all cash/coins found belongs to Moonbeam's Marxist Thugs.
70 posted on
02/27/2014 2:30:05 AM PST by
skinkinthegrass
(The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
To: BunnySlippers
Who didn't see this coming? By the time the lawyers they hire to keep the gold lose the case, this windfall will bankrupt them.
76 posted on
02/27/2014 4:41:28 AM PST by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
To: BunnySlippers
I knew it.I,and others here,called this yesterday.Somehow the State of Kalifornia or the US Treasury will wind up with these coins.
To: upchuck; BunnySlippers
Dont Freepers search before posting anymore?Don't Freepers put keywords under KEYWORDS anymore so threads can be searched before posting???
And as of this post it still has not been done.
To: BunnySlippers
There is certainly compelling evidence to link the two bounties. According to 1901 reports, 500 coins were stolen by Dimmick - only 73 coins less than the 1,427 discovered at Saddle Ridge.Somewhere there is a math major, or a numismatist, or a copy editor, or a detective who can make sense of this statement.
To: BunnySlippers
That will teach ‘em to keep their mouths shut.
They should have “found” their cache someplace with less onerous laws, and released them slowly.
86 posted on
02/27/2014 5:34:39 AM PST by
Little Ray
(How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
To: BunnySlippers
“There is certainly compelling evidence to link the two bounties. According to 1901 reports, 500 coins were stolen by Dimmick - only 73 coins less than the 1,427 discovered at Saddle Ridge.”
Huh?
88 posted on
02/27/2014 5:57:46 AM PST by
ops33
(Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
To: BunnySlippers
Should have kept their mouths shut. That’s what I would have done.
102 posted on
02/27/2014 7:55:25 AM PST by
Bon of Babble
(Don't want to brag...but I can still fit into the earrings I wore in high school!!)
To: BunnySlippers
+1 to the Freeper who noted “shut up” when this find was first announced.
114 posted on
03/04/2014 9:26:31 AM PST by
CPONuke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson