Have fun tonight, by making that farce of a speech's viewing a ZERO.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: Yosemitest
Ammo inventory.....
and rearranging my sock drawer....
RLTW.
3 posted on
01/28/2014 2:19:12 PM PST by
military cop
(I carry a .45....cause they don't make a .46....)
To: Yosemitest
Is something special happening tonight?
What have I missed?
4 posted on
01/28/2014 2:19:16 PM PST by
x1stcav
("The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.")
To: Yosemitest
I recorded “True Detective” and will watch that.
5 posted on
01/28/2014 2:19:17 PM PST by
Mikey_1962
(Democrats have destroyed more cities than Godzilla)
To: Yosemitest
According to the power company, which just sent an email warning of expected, extended power outages due to ice, I’ll be freezing my nether regions in the dark.
To: Yosemitest
Just painted a room ,I think I’ll watch the paint dry
7 posted on
01/28/2014 2:19:23 PM PST by
molson209
(Hillary Clinton)
To: Yosemitest
My jazz quintet is having a rehearsal.
8 posted on
01/28/2014 2:19:27 PM PST by
Maceman
To: Yosemitest
Lakers play tonight so will watch them lose..again..but even watching my team lose is more interesting than hearing a Marxist sack of sh*t go on and on about how America stinks and how Communism is best
To: Yosemitest
Fortunately, it is my Company's staff dinner dance.
Excellent planning!
10 posted on
01/28/2014 2:20:19 PM PST by
Churchillspirit
(9/11/2001 and 9/11/2012: NEVER FORGET.)
To: Yosemitest
I am probably in the minority on this (of FReepers), but I feel compelled to watch him at times like this, because I feel it is important to know what he really says (as opposed to relying on the media spin that follows). And there is some entertainment factor, at a minimum, in watching Reid and Pelosi, et al, bobbing up and down applauding for every little thing he says.
11 posted on
01/28/2014 2:20:38 PM PST by
NEMDF
To: Yosemitest
13 posted on
01/28/2014 2:21:11 PM PST by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: Yosemitest
14 posted on
01/28/2014 2:21:55 PM PST by
Nifster
To: Yosemitest
15 posted on
01/28/2014 2:22:00 PM PST by
Noumenon
(Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
To: Yosemitest
17 posted on
01/28/2014 2:22:18 PM PST by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: Yosemitest
There must a zombie movie on somewhere; there usually is. The Walking Dead would be the best to symbolize the marionettes jumping up on command at each of Obama’s applause lines.
18 posted on
01/28/2014 2:22:22 PM PST by
Truth29
To: Yosemitest
To: Yosemitest
Catching up on “True Detective”.
.
22 posted on
01/28/2014 2:23:37 PM PST by
Mears
To: Yosemitest
P.S. :
Let's not forget that the "FALSE FLAG" of "Minimum Wage" kills jobs.
Minimum-wage increase proposals are NOT about minimum wages.
It's about UNION wages (read government employees mostly) and UNION DUES.
Like "Artie" on another thread wrote.
"but my theory is thatthis is one of the foundations of single payer.
Down the road, as single payer replaces ObamaCare,all healthcare workers will become in essence government employees.Think about how many thousands of new, dues paying union members will magically become part of the SEIU.
Barry had sealed this deal with Andy Stern years ago.
Barry promised Andy and the SEIU thousands of new members,Andy saysgreat,
this is the wage structure we needso we can pay the slush fund.
Gotta pay a living wage to all of the new union membersso dues can be extracted
and kickbacks to the dems can be made.
Its convolutedbut what dem scheme isnt,especially when large sums of cash are involved?"
So read the following:Union Support Of Minimum Wage Hike Is Self-Interested
Mary Kay Henry, president of the Service Employees International Union, ... was quick to emphasize that her organization's support of a more-than-twofold increase in the minimum wage was "not about growing unions."
This may be true but it's also undeniable that such a move would have a profound impact on growing union paychecks, even if those unions don't count a single minimum-wage employee in their ranks.
The fine print can be found in union contracts. Each year, the Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards (OLMS) releases a number of union collective bargaining agreements (CBAs).
Unsurprisingly, many CBAs available in the OLMS database LINK union salaries and wage rates to the federal minimum wage. There are a number of methods that unions use to accomplish this end. The two most popular appear to be setting baseline union wages as a percentage above the minimum wage, and mandating a flat wage at a set level above the minimum wage.
One example is a series of CBAs signed with the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees (UNITE). Their contracts mandated that"(w)henever the federal legal minimum wage is increased, minimum wage (in the agreement) shall be increased so that each will be at least fifteen (15%) percent higher than such legal minimum wage."
There's also an SEIU local's contract, which ordered that"(t)he minimum hourly wage rates shall exceed any statutory applicable minimum wage rate by 50 cents."
Some unions have also arranged contracts where the employer MUST renegotiate their contracts in case of a minimum-wage hike, NO MATTER HOW LONG is left on the pact's life span.
The possibility for abuse here is staggering:Unions with average wages WELL ABOVE the minimum wage CAN INSERT such clauses into their contracts, FORCING negotiations in industries not otherwise affected by a wage hike.
Given the limited number of CBAs available in the OLMS database, it's impossible to determine just how widespread this practice is.
But at least one union has trumpeted this arrangement as "one of the many advantages of being a union member."
Earlier this year on its blog, the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union proudly boasted that "oftentimes, union contracts ARE TRIGGERED TO IMPLEMENT WAGE HIKES IN CASE OF MINIMUM WAGE INCREASES."
This is a stunning admission of SELF-INTERESTt for an organization that's actively PUSHING minimum-wage hikes at both the state and federal levels of government.
It also raises questions about unions' growing use of nonunion "worker centers" like the Restaurant Opportunities Center, OUR Walmart, Fast Food Forward and other organizations that have made headlines in recent months.
These groups advocate many policies that would affect those businesses that pay a minimum wage restaurants, retailers, etc. and a minimum-wage hike is often the FIRST demand that these union front groups make. This only casts further suspicion on the motives of the labor unions funding these groups.
No matter how you look at it, the benefits that these unions stand to reap from a minimum-wage hike should raise questions about their real motives and whether they're only manipulating the debate over fast-food wages for their own benefit.
Berman is the executive director at the Center for Union Facts.
23 posted on
01/28/2014 2:23:43 PM PST by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
I’ll be watching the mini series “Chasing Shackleton” which I purchased on iTunes.
24 posted on
01/28/2014 2:23:54 PM PST by
JaguarXKE
(1973: Reporters investigate All the President's Men. 2013: Reporters ARE all the President's men)
To: Yosemitest
Watching “Atlas Shrugged”, part 2.
25 posted on
01/28/2014 2:24:03 PM PST by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: Yosemitest
I have a regular Tuesday evening class. You could not pay me enough to watch and listen to the lie fest tonight.
26 posted on
01/28/2014 2:24:06 PM PST by
Hoffer Rand
(If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. *Asterisk.*)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson