To: Baynative
After the break up John Lennon's music was often closer to rock than anything McCartney ever came up with.
You picked one release from each of them as an example. "Walls and Bridges" and "Imagine" were watery (except "Whatever Gets You through the Night" and the powerful but ultimately boring "Beef Jerky"). His anthem "Imagine" is now more of a lounge club/lefty staple even as Silly Love Songs stays in the Top 40 pop box it was always meant to be in.
Even the album entitled "Rock'n'Roll" is largely populated with slower covers (the released "Stand by Me") and filler (Ya-Ya). Worst cover album of its type since Bowie's Pin-Ups.
Heck, Harrison's "Thanks for the Pepperoni" has more Rock spirit in it than "Instant Karma", "Mind Games" and "Imagine" put together. George managed to put down the sitar for 10 minutes and got some great studio help.
Paul McCartney never pretended to be Aerosmith. He could write pop (Band on the Run, Listen to What the Man Says), country (Sally G), straight rock (Rock Show,Juniors Farm, Jet, Helen Wheels), opera (Liverpool Oratorio), slow rock (Venus and Mars, Letting Go), and could tinker on piano, guitar and bass.
He is not my favorite, but the man has talent, even with half his brain burnt out from weed.
Also, Paul McCartney won't force us to buy a half dozen Yoko Ono tracks to get his last album.
19 posted on
12/17/2013 3:02:05 PM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: Dr. Sivana
"You picked one release from each of them as an example"
Those were the only songs I could think of because I never found either of them interesting. I like music that makes me tap my toe.
22 posted on
12/17/2013 3:09:09 PM PST by
Baynative
(Wake me up early, be good to my dogs and teach my children to pray.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson