1 posted on
11/16/2013 7:11:55 AM PST by
Lazamataz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Lazamataz
2 posted on
11/16/2013 7:13:23 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
To: Lazamataz
Flustercluck would be a good also.
4 posted on
11/16/2013 7:17:54 AM PST by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: Lazamataz
Frankly Scarlett I would prefer the more accurate CLUCK.
But Hey, you are running the show and you seem to know what you are doing so...
6 posted on
11/16/2013 7:19:48 AM PST by
wita
To: Lazamataz
...but then you would need at least 50 people to liaise with the gummint bureaucrats that would annoy you, slow productivity, waste your time and make you take them to lunch.
But thanks for this...I believe all of what you say.
7 posted on
11/16/2013 7:20:01 AM PST by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must.)
To: Lazamataz
Isn’t it likely then that most of the money spent on this “fusterclick” found its way into the offshore bank accounts of certain individuals and campaign coffers? Politicians never miss a chance to fleece the taxpayers.
8 posted on
11/16/2013 7:20:38 AM PST by
ez
(Muslims do not play well with others.)
To: FRiends
We all know Gunny's assessment of the Obamacare website.
Click the Pic
Support Free Republic
10 posted on
11/16/2013 7:24:42 AM PST by
deoetdoctrinae
(Gun-free zones are playgrounds for felons.)
To: Lazamataz
Laz, your healthcare website would have been peopled by healthy and pretty ladies.
To: Lazamataz
"FUSTERCLICK" (c)
To: Lazamataz
You forgot one thing.
Who's gonna screw in the lightbulb?
15 posted on
11/16/2013 7:36:12 AM PST by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: Lazamataz
You failed to include Michelle’s schoolmate and her company. Gee, do you think that had anything to do with this ... ?
17 posted on
11/16/2013 7:41:36 AM PST by
SES1066
(To expect courteous government is insanity!)
To: Lazamataz
What we said when we said what we said was FUSTERCLICK. Period.
19 posted on
11/16/2013 7:45:16 AM PST by
Berlin_Freeper
(What we said when we said what we said was. Period.)
To: Lazamataz
21 posted on
11/16/2013 7:46:15 AM PST by
Spruce
To: Lazamataz
“one Business Analyst who knew the legislation,”
“Knowing” the legislation might be a bigger problem than you think.
22 posted on
11/16/2013 7:49:07 AM PST by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
To: Lazamataz
if I had the following team . . . . . . I have no doubt at all that you could have delivered a functioning website for $12 million or so, tops.
But, on one hand, you didn't make a sizable contribution to the ObaMao campaign for a no bid contract.
And, on the other, what good does a well functioning cash register do for a store selling a tainted and defective product except postpone the inevitable?
23 posted on
11/16/2013 7:49:10 AM PST by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Lazamataz
You would have charged $15 million and 3 years? I have no idea how these websites are made but I heard prices as low as $50 grand and as short a time as 3 months. I mean what is the whole point of this website? To sign people up to an insurance plan. So why would this take 3 years and millions of dollars?
25 posted on
11/16/2013 7:50:52 AM PST by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(What do we want? Time travel. When do we want it? It's irrelevant.)
To: Lazamataz
While you are obviously super tech savvy, you lack the necessary experience of working with government. It's not about how much you can SAVE, it's about how much you can SPEND... ;-)
Cheap and efficient subcontractors like yourself are a dime a dozen. Therefore the need to hire someone like Michele's "Ivy League" classmate as the non-compete prime contractor. She is much better at assembling a team capable of creative cost increase justification and knowledgeable about distributing excessive profits, beyond a common business professional's imagination, "appropriately".
Have they even exceeded a 1B dollar cost yet? Mild by the comparision of other government IT projects - go check it out...
26 posted on
11/16/2013 7:56:54 AM PST by
Errant
To: Lazamataz
Bump!
And we should have lunch some time in Dec. I have interesting news.
29 posted on
11/16/2013 8:00:20 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: Lazamataz
Trademark the term. You may get rich yet.
To: Lazamataz
33 posted on
11/16/2013 8:07:29 AM PST by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Lazamataz
I would not have charged 300 million, I would have charged 12 million -- maybe even 15!.... and we would have all gotten EXTREMELY wealthy on it.It used to be for LESS THAN the cost of a poorly designed, insecure, inefficient website, we could go to Mars and back, employ a lot more people, conduct a lot of neat scientific experiments and have tons of spare change.
41 posted on
11/16/2013 8:13:17 AM PST by
MrsEmmaPeel
(a government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson