Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google cashes in on hate videos: Puts ads alongside thousands of terror rants on YouTube
Mail Online ^ | 27 May 2013 | Arthur Martin and Lucy Osborne

Posted on 05/27/2013 10:30:48 PM PDT by Windflier

Google is profiting from adverts which appear alongside vile terror videos on YouTube, it emerged last night.

The Mail has found adverts for reputable companies on videos of Al Qaeda fanatics calling for jihad.

The companies, which include Vodafone, TalkTalk and iTunes, have little control over where their products feature on the hugely popular film-sharing website.

One major advertiser said Google ‘have got a lot to answer for’.

A source said: ‘It is ridiculous that they would put our advertisements on videos such as these. We don’t have a choice in this at all.

‘We don’t want to be associated with these videos in any way whatsoever. We do not want to be associated with someone blowing someone else’s head up or someone spreading evil and hate.’

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 666; fagtube; google; islam; islamonazis; terrorism
Full title: Google cashes in on hate videos: Internet giant puts ads alongside thousands of terror rants on YouTube
1 posted on 05/27/2013 10:30:49 PM PDT by Windflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Google is the DNC.

The real Obama Phones: the Android Os ones.


2 posted on 05/27/2013 10:34:42 PM PDT by NoLibZone (None here can be puzzled by why Jews walked into the cars so quietly- we are walking up the planks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

From the article:

“Yesterday the Mail reported how thousands of Al Qaeda videos urging British Muslims to maim and kill can be found on YouTube within seconds.

This is despite claims by the website that it has ‘community guidelines’ that prohibit ‘dangerous of illegal activities such as bomb making, hate speech and incitement to commit violent acts’ and accepts only ‘religious’ films.

In one clip, Anwar al-Awlaki, the dead ideological leader of Al Qaeda, describes how ‘Islam is spread by the sword’.”


3 posted on 05/27/2013 10:38:00 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Google making money from hatred. Why doesn’t that surprise me?


4 posted on 05/27/2013 10:50:30 PM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
“Yesterday the Mail reported how thousands of Al Qaeda videos urging British Muslims to maim and kill can be found on YouTube within seconds.

This is despite claims by the website that it has ‘community guidelines’ that prohibit ‘dangerous of illegal activities such as bomb making, hate speech and incitement to commit violent acts’ and accepts only ‘religious’ films.

In one clip, Anwar al-Awlaki, the dead ideological leader of Al Qaeda, describes how ‘Islam is spread by the sword’.”

But put up a video avocating deporting them all and place your bets on how many minutes it'll take before it's pulled (along with the poster's account).

5 posted on 05/27/2013 11:06:58 PM PDT by expat1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

YouTube users upload 60 HOURS of new videos EVERY MINUTE. Do you really expect that anyone actually watches it all to enforce any rules?

They have some automated filters, I imagine, but realistically there’s no way to censor at the level you seem to expect. It’s not possible to control content in detail, at that rate of new addition.

Their claim of enforcing rules is based on other users complaining, and then responding to complaints.

So, complain to the site about each hate video you see....


6 posted on 05/27/2013 11:30:19 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

wow...who owns google? I think we should boycott it until they gain some standards! Good lord!


7 posted on 05/27/2013 11:32:40 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fabian

wow...who owns google?
***stockholders

I think we should boycott it until they gain some standards! Good lord!
***I agree. But boycotts take a lot of effort and no one has the time.


8 posted on 05/27/2013 11:40:53 PM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Google is an enemy.

They support everything I oppose and oppose everything I support.

They took the Linux kernel and built a phishing expedition masquerading as an OS appropriately named, “Android”. They should be despised just for that.

They capture every keystroke you make on their search engines, as well as every gesture on their cell phones. They track you. They know where you are. They feed all the information to the Democrat Party for free, and they sell all the information to whoever will buy.

They are to be avoided as much as is humanly possible.


9 posted on 05/28/2013 1:59:19 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Google ads are automatic. You find a hate speech vid, hit the “abuse” button, Google takes it down.


10 posted on 05/28/2013 2:56:36 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Mostly not.

Try hitting abuse on a democrat antisemite rant about the illuminati jews.

Already at the time Joe Lieberman started looking at the internet, youtube was the most important site in the world for the online jihad.


11 posted on 05/28/2013 4:26:26 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama equals Osama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Do you really believe that? Try it, that’s BS. Google will suspend accounts for posting videos against Islam but they rarely remove the jihad material.


12 posted on 05/28/2013 4:51:55 AM PDT by wrencher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

“ou find a hate speech vid, hit the “abuse” button, Google takes it down.”

untrue


13 posted on 05/28/2013 4:53:03 AM PDT by wrencher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I will buy BACON from any company who advertising on an Al Quada rant!


14 posted on 05/28/2013 5:10:47 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrencher
I will guarantee you that YouTube/Google doesn't have a basement full of twinkie eating computer geeks combing the vids for abuses. Unless you mark a video using the Abuse flag, they're not even going to consider taking it down.

Here's what it says at the bottom of the abuse report form:

Flagged videos and users are reviewed by YouTube staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination. If you would like to report a channel, please click here

Now, if you want to start some conspiracy theory about Google being anti-sematic and pro-Islamic, I'm outta here.

15 posted on 05/28/2013 6:13:30 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Windflier; All
Obama guard dog Fx News is basically doing the same garbage to keep peoples' eyes glued to their TV screens between highly profitable commercials, by keeping the federal government's constitutionally limited powers out of public policy discussions.

After all, if voters knew about Congress's constitutionally limited powers then unconstitutionally big federal government would be out of business arguably overnight. "News" agencies would then have to create another national soap opera to keep people's eyes glued to TV screens or lose advertizing dollars.

16 posted on 05/28/2013 4:15:03 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Your ignorance is astounding. Try it sometime and see how it works in practice. There’s people that have spent years trying to get Google to remove jihad and anti-Semitic content. See mypetjawa.mu.nu

Yes, Google is pro jihad, “Arab spring”, and hosts numerous anti-Semitic channels such as Michael Delaney of Prothink/TruTube, Scott Roberts of TheForbiddenTruth, and other people such as the religious fraud “Brother Nathanael” in accordance with their radical Islamist leanings.

Google has not the slightest interest in removing them when pointed out.


17 posted on 05/28/2013 5:26:16 PM PDT by wrencher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
> I will guarantee you that YouTube/Google doesn't have a basement full of twinkie eating computer geeks combing the vids for abuses. Unless you mark a video using the Abuse flag, they're not even going to consider taking it down.

There you go, trying to be sensible and rational. :) I made the same mistake above (#6).

Those folks who want to believe that Google is the Great Satan will do so, and find justification in the fact that Google doesn't necessarily do what those folks want them to do. I don't think people really understand what 60 hrs of new video every minute really means. I have to wonder whether they actually use the YouTube "Abuse" function, or merely want to complain. Since they provide no links to the vids they think should be taken down, that they've hit "Abuse" on with no effect, it's hard to tell.

Personally I don't like Google much; they're snoops and occasionally they do something really bad. But the Great Satan, nah.

18 posted on 05/28/2013 5:28:37 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson