It is noticeable that you keep avoiding those 14,700 replications.
So, you had said that you accept these measurements. These 7 scientists are simply measuring fakery, according to you. Then what about the 14,700 other times the same kind of measurements generated very similar results? Were all those faked? Is it a giant conspiracy?
WW, here is how the dialog gets poisoned by the overly aggressive skeptical ‘humans’ (OASHs). You get to the point that a poster acknowledges certain evidence, so you move onto the next evidence. But they never answer the question nor consider the evidence, because the OASHs start peppering the thread back & forth with the same old falsehoods and lies. So the poster decides not to investigate. Ignoring the OASHs doesn’t help, in fact in this case it contributes to the problem. Truly anti-science behavior from the OASHs. Damage done, as intended.
It is noticeable that you keep avoiding those 14,700 replications.
So, you had said that you accept these measurements. These 7 scientists are simply measuring fakery, according to you. Then what about the 14,700 other times the same kind of measurements generated very similar results? Were all those faked? Is it a giant conspiracy?