Funny I did not see anything in the article about SUBORNING PERJURY by the DISTRICT ATTORNEY in this case,Nor the Judge for allowing FALSE TESTIMONY. sending note now to greenhut.
The DA would need to know the document was a phony to be culpable. “Oh, Officer Jones never clued me in that this was a ruse document, not a testimony document.” And the judge can kick @$$ for a fraud on the court, but it’s only after the fact, and probably just to ding the DA a fine and forbid him from using that cop again in testimony. So nobody really bears responsibility, it’s just an “oops” mix-up that got “caught” when the “system worked.” And the step from there to serious nod and wink is very, very tiny.
How about forgery of a state document – a slam dunk conviction?