Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Redmen4ever
"This year, there shouldn’t be a national championship game. LSU is #1. Nobody disagrees with that. The argument is over who is #2."
 
So, if Alabama beats LSU in the "title" game, would "everybody" still agree that LSU is still #1? 
 
Some would simply say "well, LSU was the best team in the nation during the regular season". 
 
Others would say "well, Alabama was the best team in the nation at the end of the year and that is what counts".
 
A few would say "bring on the rubber match!"
 
Or, perhaps "folks, we have a tie!"
 
Of course, you'll hear "this proves we need a playoff system!!" and "the BCS sucks!"
 
As for me, I'll say "bring on the roundballers!".

47 posted on 12/06/2011 9:03:16 AM PST by Let_It_Be_So (Once you see the Truth, you cannot "unsee" it, no matter how hard you may try.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Let_It_Be_So

I am not sure as to whether Alabama beating LSU would catapult it over LSU into #1 if the BCS ranking were to decide the matter. I would think so if Alabama convincingly beat LSU. But let’s say that Alabama beat LSU by the exact score and circumstance that LSU beat Alabama during the regular season. Then, I think a lot of people would vote for LSU, others for Alabama and still others for the winner of the Oklahoma State versus Stanford game.

In the old days, pre-BCS, we often wound up with multiple national champions. In those days, college football consisted of ten games with the possibility of one bowl game. Today, twelve games is the norm, with the possibility of a conference championship games and a bowl game. Some people are argued for a playoff system; possibly with four teams and the elimination of conference bowl games, so as not to add to an already long season for people who are supposed to be students.

Nowadays, we have multiple teams bowl ineligible among the highest ranking teams, embarrassments like Penn State going to a bowl game, a 6-7 team going to a bowl game, and official records having to be re-written because of multiple recruiting violations. Yet, is the game more exciting today than it was twenty years ago, when bowl games were officially post-season exhibition games and we had to deal with the uncertainty of who really is the national champion?


51 posted on 12/06/2011 10:52:57 AM PST by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson