That is a Strange omission that indicates a bias, or poor research.
No, it just indicates poor reading on your part. The CRS author spends a full page on Minor v. Happersett, specifically on pp. 28-29 (pp. 31-32 of the PDF).
yep - it was mentioned, and I missed it.
Strange how the author got the interpretation of that case wrong, and left it out of the summary - doncha think?