Posted on 08/16/2011 8:08:43 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
Well that didn't take long.
Perry's been in the race what - 2 days - and he's already got our marxist lying cheeseball in chief on the defensive, and liberals TOTALLY freaking out.
Nice! So far so good, Governor.
That's a good thing. For both of them, and for America.
And it's simpler now. Just say "PDS".
I remember Labor Day weekend 2008. No, he’s not.
Liberals are terrified of Perry because he actually has a resume and Obama has nothing but a lot of hot air and a teleprompter. The lame stream media will be attacking Perry left and right and if that doesn’t work, they will go after his family. However, they can not intimidate Perry. Sit back and watch the fun.
Perry
Derangement
Syndrome
Turnabout is fair play.
P
D
S
Works for me. There is plenty of it out there, and now Rick even manages to co-opt the bots favorite dart, “PDS”! Rick makes the darndest things FUN, and runs up the numbers on Romney at the same time! LOL! It’s going to get funky out there but I really think Rick can pull it off.
It has been exasperating for months that any criticism of Sarah Palin, not on personal but on other grounds was met with cries of PDS!!!
- - - - - -
It has been exasperating, and the insulting and belittling comments by a few have made some rethink their support for Palin, which is a concern.
I have never said anything negative about Palin, but I defended a Christian brother who was accused of not being a Christian because he asked a question about Palin and I was accused of PDS. Really? That is is insane.
Actually, I think it’s all silly.
According to SOME who support her, if you oppose her, you suffer from PDS and believe she stomps on newborn puppies with stiletto heels!
Conversely, according to SOME who don’t support her, if you support her, you’re a Palinbot and believe she sits at the Right hand side of Jesus Christ, worthy of worship!
(Forgive my hyperbole but that’s what it seems to have come to)
It’s silly. Schoolyard, childish nonsense. People should be able to ask questions about the policies and positions of any of these candidates without being labeled as suffering from derangement and, conversely, people should be able to support whomever they choose without being labeled as a “bot”.
Palin / Perry 2012. :P
It’s amazing to me that even as President the man has accomplished absolutely nothing. His resume would be fit for a travel agent, golf caddy, teleprompter reader and Indonesian socialist government infiltrator.
Well said.
I have to wonder, if someone thinks Sarah would be a great senator but does not yet have enough experience for the presidency, does said individual have PDS?
Very well said and appreciated.
Conversely, according to SOME who dont support her, if you support her, youre a Palinbot and believe she sits at the Right hand side of Jesus Christ, worthy of worship! .... Sister_T
To be clear, a Palin "supporter" is somebody with whom you can rationally discuss the pros and cons of Palin in comparison with any other candidate.
"The recent FOX News Poll: (August 7-9, 2011) showed that 75% of all voters believe that Palin would not be a good President. That has serious implications for the general election. So, let's talk about it."
A Palin "worshiper" is somebody that takes it to such an extreme that, as in reaganaut's case, the mere questioning of Palin is considered a transgression against Christianity itself.
"UnChristian! PDS! UnChristian! PDS!"
It is only now, after many months, that more FReepers are starting to stand up to the Palin fanatics. Before, most stayed quiet in order to avoid what reaganaut's friend had to endure.
Even Palin "supporters" were ripped apart by the "worshipers" if, at any point on a Palin thread, the supporter failed to meet the required level of unquestioning devotion to Sarah Palin.
As a result, even "supporters" were forced to act like "worshipers" or keep quiet. The alternative was a mass attack.
Well said! This is what the primaries are for, to get ALL the ideas out there, and to mull them over. I have no use for ugliness.
No, but that person should expect to be challenged on the merits of those claims.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.