[cumbo78]

The same point was made by multiple scientists in the documentary “The Great Global Warming Swindle”

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Related thread:

Blockbuster: Planetary temperature controls CO2 levels — not humans

[Baynative]

Most of us who have been properly labeled as skeptics have been on the right track for some time.

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

Please, don't be silly, the evidence for AGW is almost as strong as the evidence for N-rays and the planet orbiting Barnard's star.

[Talisker]

Salby is arguing that atmospheric CO2 increase that we observe is a product of temperature increase, and not the other way around, meaning it is a product of natural variation.

"Global Warming's Dead, Jim."

[Lazlo in PA]

[Raycpa]

He has the reputation of a thorough and careful researcher.

Well there's your problem right there.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

As a chemist, I've been arguing this for years.

As the temperature of the oceans rise, the amount of dissolved CO2 they can retain decreases.

Decrease the temperature of the oceans, and they absorb CO2 from the atmosphere.

You can even see it in microcosm, as the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere fluctuates annually with the seasons:

[RegulatorCountry]

It’s been reasonably obvious to anyone the least bit capable of reading a graph that rising temperatures are a leading indicator of rising CO2 levels and not the other way around.

Anyone who isn’t blinded by political science, that is.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

278 Responses to The Emily Litella moment for climate science and CO2 ?

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks Ernest.

[FreeKeys]

click: