The analogy was not a defense of the case. It was trying to explain to my children how a jury could come to the conclusion using logic and the evidence that is presented. You guys are the ones that went crazy with it.
I don’t care about the evidence as you saw it. Evidently the jury got a better look, because they do not agree with you...and that’s all that matters for the defense isn’t it?
The Scott Peterson case might be a good analogy, but we won’t know because the body DID show up. As they say, getting an indictment is not really that hard. Indictments, as we learned this week, are not convictions.
“I don’t care about the evidence....”
Finally. I rest my case.