[ZX12R]

You also said that a murderer went free. You now not only have to prove that it was murder and not an accident but you also have to prove that Casey did it. Can you?

I think that's the point. The state already proved it in spades, and you keep proving that you are not able to see it. That jury was indeed your peers.

[Cheryllynn]

“I think that’s the point. The state already proved it in spades, and you keep proving that you are not able to see it. That jury was indeed your peers.”

Exactly. Perhaps Scotty Peterson should go free? They had less evidence on him..

[CynicalBear]

>> I think that's the point. The state already proved it in spades, and you keep proving that you are not able to see it.<<

Proved what? Was it murder or an accident? Even the prosecutor in an interview after the trial admitted that they didn’t know if it was a murder or an accident that was covered up. If they didn’t know how can you?