[Maceman]

I would vote for Palin in the general election, but I will be voting for Herman Cain in the primary.

I think he is more electable than Palin because he doesn’t have the high negatives that Palin needs to overcome, and his voice is much less irritating.

Also, I think his executive experience is stronger than Palin. Don’t get me wrong. I love Sarah Palin. But I do think Cain is the better candidate.

[C. Edmund Wright]

Agreed. And I too love them both.

[mel]

I really like Cain also, amazing fellow

[Logic n' Reason]

I think he is more electable than Palin because he doesn’t have the high negatives that Palin needs to overcome, and his voice is much less irritating.

Speaking only from having watched Mr. Cain's "announcement" speech....to my ears, there's way too much "southern baptist preacher" in there....coupled with a very annoying laugh/giggle.

I'll throw up a little bit in my throat when I say this, but the stain is a better public speaker than either of them.

OK .... OK..... he only reads what's on his trusty teleprompter....but he reads well.

The debates are going to be fun, because the stain WILL NOT have his trusty teleprompter.

[Gargantua]

"Also, I think his executive experience is stronger than Palin."

Oh, heck yeah. Anyone who ever worked in a pizza shop will tell you, it's much more demanding than being Governor of a State... negotiating oil pipelines with the three largest corporations on the planet and three different countries, Commander in Chief of Alaska's Air National Guard, that's tiddlywinks compared to chairing a board meeting.

Hey, is that drool on my chin?

;-\

[rintense]

So not voting for someone because of an irritating voice? Oh brother. You do know the difference between speaking to a crowd of thousands outside versus a sit down TV interview, right?