Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

That Green Thing
Vanity ^ | 28 March 2011 | Unknown

Posted on 03/28/2011 8:58:36 PM PDT by Windflier

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: FrankR
I was there then, and I'm here now, and today's environmentalism ideas, back then, would have gotten you labeled an alarmist and village idiot in one fell swoop.

Ain't that the truth. Common sense was actually COMMON, only a few decades ago.

As I said upthread, insanity like what we see in today's green movement, is one of the primary reasons the Tea Party sprang up. Americans who still have some of their common sense left, are sick and tired of the drip, drip, drip of liberal idiocies being foisted upon us.

"Green" has nothing whatsoever to do with "saving the planet", and everything to do with transforming America into a totalitarian Socialist police state, where our Constitution and our Bill of Rights are no more.

21 posted on 03/28/2011 9:50:02 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Yes, but how green are you? That the thing, you know.

Asking me that in person is a good way to test my self-control.

22 posted on 03/28/2011 9:52:59 PM PDT by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Ha. Very good.

I just wonder how much energy it took to sterilize and reuse all those bottles.


23 posted on 03/28/2011 9:59:01 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

But he sincerely believed in his heart that he was an Indian. Really!


24 posted on 03/28/2011 9:59:46 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

‘...and of course there was always Smokey The Bear.”
_______________________

Remember back in the day when that commercial said “only you can prevent ‘forest’ fires?” Well, they burned all the damned forests down so now it says “only you can prevent’wildfires’.


25 posted on 03/28/2011 10:00:14 PM PDT by CTOCS (I live in my own little world. But, it's okay. They know me there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Yeah, it’s like washing out the glass jars for recycling. My wife told me, “It’s just a little bit of water.” “It’s just a little bit of glass,” I replied. I honestly don’t know how the equations balance out on this one. I think the critical resource here is landfill.


26 posted on 03/28/2011 10:03:01 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
Asking me that in person is a good way to test my self-control.

The very least you'd get out of me would be a serious eye-roll. Depending on my mood, and the circumstance, it might be best if my wife was there to chill me out.

27 posted on 03/28/2011 10:30:09 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
I just wonder how much energy it took to sterilize and reuse all those bottles.

I guarantee you, it took a lot less energy and materials, than simply washing them.

Think about it. Would the bottlers have paid us a redemption fee to turn 'em in, if it was more expensive?

28 posted on 03/28/2011 10:32:12 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CTOCS
...they burned all the damned forests down so now it says “only you can prevent’wildfires’.

Contrary to popular opinion, there are now more trees growing in America's forests, than there were at the turn of the 19th century. Studies on that have been posted here a bunch of times.

No, it's just the Commie greens trying to take more and more lands out of the control of private hands, and put them under the control of the gubmint. It's for our own good, of course.

29 posted on 03/28/2011 10:36:15 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

“We didn’t take the 300 hp machine, because very few people could even afford a car.”

My parents both had cars since the 20s.

My mother drove a model T to L.A. High in 1923 and my dad drove a model T to San Diego High in 1916.

I had a 1940 coupe with a 3/8x3/8 flathead all ready to go street racing on my 16th birthday in 1952 that I bought and paid for with money I made myself.


30 posted on 03/28/2011 10:39:24 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

The old milk/beer/soda bottles were made from thick, high quality glass with screen printing that certainly cost a pretty penny to manufacture, so it made sense to reuse them back then. (Similar to Pyrex type glass.)


31 posted on 03/28/2011 10:50:43 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

The Model T Ford had a 20 hp engine.


32 posted on 03/28/2011 10:57:01 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I’m betting that the flatscreens we have today are a lot more efficient than the old thermionic-valve cathode TVs from 60 years ago. Yes, they do use some energy in “off” mode, unless you actually turn the main switch off, but they also don’t take 5 minutes to warm up enough to show a picture. Those old TVs also threw off a lot of (wasted energy) heat, and there was a fair-sized orange glow on the wall behind them from all the tubes inside. And then there’s the whole radiation thing. TVs weren’t safe to sit close to until the mid-70s at least. I’ll take my 35” flattie over a 17” tube-type any day.


33 posted on 03/28/2011 11:08:30 PM PDT by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

At least they wern’t drawn by a horse!


34 posted on 03/28/2011 11:11:01 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Did you write that?

It's GREAT! So totally true!

35 posted on 03/28/2011 11:35:03 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
I guarantee you, it took a lot less energy and materials, than simply washing them. Think about it. Would the bottlers have paid us a redemption fee to turn 'em in, if it was more expensive?

You nailed it. I remember when I was a kid, 8 to 11 years old, finding soda pop bottles was a great source of income -- the really good ones were worth a dime, the price of an Almond Joy! All the vacant lots and roadsides were kept a lot more litter-free because of us kids scrounging for bottles to take back to the store for cash, which which we would immediately buy the candy that our mothers would never let us have!

36 posted on 03/28/2011 11:44:23 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

The cashier was totally out of line. My response probably would have been: “Who cares, I don’t have that may years left.”/s


37 posted on 03/29/2011 2:39:46 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey
The first time a cashier lectures me about my plastic bags being bad for the environment, may be the last time I shop in that store. At the least, the management is going to get an earful.

The cashier is there to cashier, not to lecture me nor anyone else on anything, including the "environmental impact" of my choices.

I don't mind a cashier asking about a product I'm buying ("Do you like that brand? I've thought about it but haven't tried it yet") or commenting favorably ("Oh, I just love that cereal, my whole family thinks it's the best ever") but no disapproving lectures about anything, period.

38 posted on 03/29/2011 2:55:21 AM PDT by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Oceander
One generation before mine and during the first decade of my life, everyone had a "bucket" with a cast iron lid in their backyard close to the kitchen door. Any garbage that did not get composted was dumped into this bucket (quite smelly and maggot ridden in summer) and a man would empty it weekly for a small fee.

The man would then feed this to his hogs; he rotated the pens for the hogs and grew food stuffs after the fecal matter was properly processed into the soil, he fed the folks that paid him to take away his fertilizer; he then slaughtered the hogs and fed the folks that paid him to take away the hog feed.

Recycling for a profit!

39 posted on 03/29/2011 3:05:55 AM PDT by BillGunn (Bill Gunn for Congress district one rep. Massachusetts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

In Omaha, they don’t let us recycle glass anymore; I guess it’s so the recyclers don’t get cut up.


40 posted on 03/29/2011 5:43:47 AM PDT by Vor Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson