Replies

Similarly, the naturalist believes that beneath every natural phenomenon there exists yet another natural phenomenon. If explanation by reference to an endless stack of large turtles is silly, then an explanation by reference to an endless stack of natural phenomena would be equally so. The naturalist's answer for the origin of life, therefore, is some natural phenomenon. (Which one is not particularly relevant.) When you ask them how that natural phenomenon came to be, their response boils down to: "It's natural phenomena all the way down!"
-Pete Chadwell

Selection pressure leads to bacteria significantly different from past types
Selection pressure leads to bacteria significantly different from past types
Selection pressure leads to bacteria significantly different from past types
Selection pressure leads to bacteria significantly different from past types
Selection pressure leads to bacteria significantly different from past types
Selection pressure leads to bacteria significantly different from past types
Selection pressure leads to bacteria significantly different from past types
Selection pressure leads to bacteria significantly different from past types
Selection pressure leads to bacteria significantly different from past types

We hold no truths to be self-evident, that all (men) are evolved based on chance, that they are endowed by a mindless chemical process from a mindless universal algorithm with uncertain unalienable illusions that among these are a delusion of life, and the pursuit of happenstance. That to secure these illusions, governments are instituted among the chemical processes (called men), deriving their just powers from the happenstance of the governed.

So your argument is now reduced to that if we try to explain ANYTHING by natural means we have to explain everything that way and become atheist anarchists?

Thanks for the source though. That was amusing!

For example, the antibiotic that targeted ribosomes...

leading to mutated ribosomes that were antibiotic resistant.