Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: surroundedbyblue
My understanding is that it shifted the burden from the accuser proving that pay was unfair to requiring the employer to prove that their pay policies were non-discriminatory to women.

And you could probably predict what would happen: employers would have to jump through endless hoops to do so.

4 posted on 11/18/2010 9:48:29 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking
And you could probably predict what would happen: employers would have to jump through endless hoops to do so.

And then they would realize it is easier to just "hire" male contractors for jobs.

The feminist leftists keep putting up laws to enforce the fanciful notion of equality and the men that actually run the businesses will find ways around it. Eventually, the objective, the worker's paradise, will be reached when legitimate private business closes or leaves the country to avoid the harassment and only the government is left to hire people.

And government will hire women. To shuffle papers from one end of the bureaucracy to another. The men will give up trying and drink away their days in a big grass hut.

Isn't matriarchy great?

10 posted on 11/18/2010 9:55:43 AM PST by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson