Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Teufel Hunden

“If you wrote a legally binding business agreement between two parties and there was nothing in the original agreement that allowed for one or the other party to opt out of the agreement. Would one party be allowed to simply opt out? No, it would have to go to court, be adjudicated and a settlement arranged.”

In most jurisdictions breach of contract (i.e., breaking a contract) can void that contract. Oh, the aggrieved party can sue for specific performance, but he can also walk away from it if the other party has broken the contract by some action or inaction, taking the argument that the breach voided the contract.

It’s funny, but all you “no right to secede” folks always overlook one thing: If Lincoln were so sure secession was illegal, why didn’t he just seek a ruling from the Supreme Court to put the stamp of law to it? He didn’t, because he was probably terrified to find out what that ruling would be (especially with Taney on the court).


271 posted on 08/05/2010 8:41:36 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: ought-six
It’s funny, but all you “no right to secede” folks always overlook one thing: If Lincoln were so sure secession was illegal, why didn’t he just seek a ruling from the Supreme Court to put the stamp of law to it? He didn’t, because he was probably terrified to find out what that ruling would be (especially with Taney on the court).

LOL. See Texas v. White

It’s funny, but all you “right to secede” folks always overlook one thing: If the south was so sure secession was legal, why didn’t they just seek a ruling from the Supreme Court to put the stamp of law to it?

274 posted on 08/05/2010 8:53:12 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

To: ought-six
"why didn’t he just seek a ruling from the Supreme Court to put the stamp of law to it?"

Lincoln was installed as our 16th President in March 1861. Fort Sumter was fired upon and captured in April 1861. The South really didn't give him much time as President to pursue the legal option now did they?
294 posted on 08/06/2010 4:42:39 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson