no, not correct.
older ATTRACTIVE women tend to be used for a good time and dispossed. (see - don’t take home to mother)
Which of my several assertions was incorrect?
older ATTRACTIVE women tend to be used for a good time and dispossed [sic!]. (see - don’t take home to mother)
I'm sorry, I'm not sure of your meaning... dispossed? Do you mean "discarded," or "disposed of?"
In any event, in fact I did say that the situation was reversed for people in the 40+ age bracket: Then, men are in a privileged position, and women (whether "attractive," as you say, or not) are disadvantaged.
But any "attractive" woman in her 40s who allows herself to be "used" and then "discarded" has no one but herself to blame; an "older but wiser" woman should know better (i.e., should be able to "suss out" - as the British say - her suitor's true motives and gauge the reliability of his "honorable intentions").
On the other hand, men just out of their teens possess relatively little life experience. They thus don't really grasp how disadvantaged they are demographically and biologically - and so, in addition to being in a poor bargaining position, they often don't even realize that they've been dealt a bad hand, thus magnifying their frustration and compounding their woes.
Regards,