Skip to comments.
5,200 Australians bare all for photo shoot
AP ^
| March 1, 2010
Posted on 03/01/2010 9:11:38 AM PST by ConservativeStatement
SYDNEYAbout 5,200 naked people embraced each other on the steps of Sydney's iconic Opera House on Monday for a photo shoot by Spencer Tunick.
Tunick, who is known for his nude group photos in public spaces, posed participants for more than an hour in a variety of positions.
"It was difficult to get the straight participants to embrace the gay participants and vice versa," Tunick said. "So I was very happy that that last set up finally got done and everyone came together (in a) united, friendly kiss, a loving kiss in front of this great structure."
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Arts/Photography
KEYWORDS: australians; homosexualagenda; naked; nude; publicitystunt; publicnudity; tunick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Someone was overheard asking if those were falsettos. /sarc.
To: ConservativeStatement
2
posted on
03/01/2010 9:16:35 AM PST
by
JimmyMc
To: ConservativeStatement
If you’re gonna make it big as an artiste, you gotta have a gimmick, wrapping landmarks in cellophane, sliced cows in formaldehyde, photographing weimaraners in fancy dress, etc.
3
posted on
03/01/2010 9:17:30 AM PST
by
sinanju
To: ConservativeStatement
Without seeing the pictures, I bet those are not the same 5200 nude Australians I would have picked for a photo shoot.
4
posted on
03/01/2010 9:17:43 AM PST
by
earlJam
To: ConservativeStatement
Wow.
PT Barnum was right.
5
posted on
03/01/2010 9:18:27 AM PST
by
lurk
To: JimmyMc
No photos please!!!Most definitely...just because they bare all, doesn't mean we have to bear the sight of it!
To: ConservativeStatement
It was difficult to get the straight normal participants to embrace the gay perverted participants...." Tunick said. And the truly nauseating part is that this clown can't understand *why* that was the case.
7
posted on
03/01/2010 9:19:34 AM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
(Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
To: lurk; Revolting cat!
The cool thing about getting 5,000 people to pose for a photo is that you can expect at least several hundred of them to line up and BUY a print later. KaCHING!
To: Gay State Conservative
He said “and vice versa”. Does this mean that they were heterophobic?
To: JimmyMc
10
posted on
03/01/2010 9:26:09 AM PST
by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet)
To: ConservativeStatement
"It was difficult to get the straight participants to embrace the gay participants and vice versa," Right. We know how reserved and shy those gays are. (eyes rolling)
Tunick, who is known for his nude group photos in public spaces, posed participants for more than an hour in a variety of positions.
It's called porn.
11
posted on
03/01/2010 9:26:11 AM PST
by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: ConservativeStatement
"It was difficult to get the straight participants to embrace the gay participants and vice versa,"
Gross.
12
posted on
03/01/2010 9:26:31 AM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Our politicians are stupid and our policies unsustainable)
To: ConservativeStatement
Throw another bare ass on the barbie.....
To: earlJam
Without seeing the pictures, I bet those are not the same 5200 nude Australians I would have picked for a photo shoot. Having walked several beaches near Sydney on hot summer days I can assure you that there are some *very* healthy young sheilas to be seen in Oz (didn't pay much attention to the blokes)!
To: subterfuge
It's called porn.
Only if you get sexually excited from old, fat, naked people standing doing absolutely nothing in public... but, hey, more power to you.
Main Entry: por·nog·ra·phy
Pronunciation: \-fē\
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek pornographos, adjective, writing about
prostitutes, from pornē prostitute + graphein to write;
akin to Greek pernanai to sell, poros journey more at fare, carve
Date: 1858
1 : the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement
15
posted on
03/01/2010 9:34:06 AM PST
by
SpinnerWebb
(mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves)
To: naturalman1975; Aussie Dasher; myknowledge
Ping
To: a fool in paradise
He said and vice versa. Does this mean that they were heterophobic? I have more phobias than you can even begin to imagine! ;-)
To: JoeProBono
Does this get your UFO ping?
.
.
.
Ugly Fat Ol’ People...
To: ConservativeStatement
straight participants to embrace the gay participants If I had to guess, the problem was more getting straights to embrace people of the same sex, and gays to embrace people of the opposite sex.
To: ConservativeStatement
“It was difficult to get the straight participants to embrace the gay participants and vice versa,”.....
I hope they have Bareasspalooza in front of the White House when it comes to the U.S.!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson