Skip to comments.
FORT LEWIS AND MCCHORD TO BECOME ONE BASE ?!
CNN
Posted on 01/31/2010 5:14:55 PM PST by Jedediah
WHAT COULD THIS MEAN ! IS MARTIAL LAW RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER ?
TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: brac; cuespookymusic; fortlewis; law; martial; morethorazineplease
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
01/31/2010 5:14:55 PM PST
by
Jedediah
To: Jedediah
2
posted on
01/31/2010 5:16:20 PM PST
by
sionnsar
(IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
To: Jedediah
Why, would the merger be part of any plot of the ruling Progressive elites?
3
posted on
01/31/2010 5:17:46 PM PST
by
STD
( Dear Leader, No Thanks We Don't Want to Share Your Political Success)
To: Jedediah
Did you see the story on the air?
4
posted on
01/31/2010 5:17:50 PM PST
by
Red Steel
To: Jedediah
5
posted on
01/31/2010 5:18:28 PM PST
by
TornadoAlley3
(Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
To: Jedediah
Pearl Harbor and Hickam are merging, too
Saves duplication of some services and facilties
To: Jedediah
There are many things to worry about, choose real things - don’t panic it serves no one.
7
posted on
01/31/2010 5:23:12 PM PST
by
svcw
(Ellie and Mark come out come out where ever you are.....)
To: Jedediah
No. It just means money savings for the taxpayer. Two separate bases that share a property line.
Two separate billeting offices, two separate security forces, two separate commissaries, two separate exchanges, two separate motor pools, two separate housing offices, two separate contracting offices.
Now, it’s one of each. Ft. Richardson and Elmendorf AFB did this a while back.
Better single facility than two crappy facilities.
8
posted on
01/31/2010 5:23:12 PM PST
by
Jet Jaguar
(When Obama walks into a room, he is the least experienced person in that room.)
To: Jedediah
RELAX....
NJ is leading this.We lost FT dix to the BRAC closing..Then we made it a national guard training base. This was so sucessful that we now have merged 2 other bases (1 navy..1 air force) with FT dix to create a mega base. This helps out
the local economy, creates jobs and now we have noticed a better communication between the military branches since they are all under one roof.
9
posted on
01/31/2010 5:23:30 PM PST
by
OL Hickory
(Jesus and the American soldier-1 died for your soul/1 died for your freedom)
To: Jedediah
It isn’t martial law unless they say that Ft Lewis and Tacoma are becoming one base.
10
posted on
01/31/2010 5:29:17 PM PST
by
Bryanw92
(Imagine a day when the politicians have to hold a bake sale to pay for votes!)
To: Red Steel
11
posted on
01/31/2010 5:39:48 PM PST
by
Jedediah
To: Jedediah
12
posted on
01/31/2010 5:43:00 PM PST
by
Tigen
(I shall raise you one .)
To: Jedediah
You been dipping into the medical mary-gee-wanna?
13
posted on
01/31/2010 5:43:42 PM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
("Anyone pushing Romney must love socialism...Piss on Romney and his enablers!!" ~ Jim Robinson)
To: Jedediah
Of course not. They are co-located; it makes absolute sense to combine the combat service support functions.
It’s not a sign of the coming apocalypse.
14
posted on
01/31/2010 5:51:20 PM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(Socialism is the plundering of the productive by the unaccountable)
To: Jedediah
WHAT COULD THIS MEAN ! IS MARTIAL LAW RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER ? No, but a zot should be. zot
15
posted on
01/31/2010 5:53:12 PM PST
by
xone
To: Jedediah
All your base...etc.
16
posted on
01/31/2010 5:55:44 PM PST
by
the invisib1e hand
(governance is not sovereignty [paraphrasing Bishop Fulton Sheen].)
To: Jedediah
WHAT COULD THIS MEAN ! IS MARTIAL LAW RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER ? No. It is the Joint Base concept. It has been in the works for 5-10 years. It is just an efficient use of base support...sharing motor pools, civil engineers, MPs...etc.
12 New Joint Bases
17
posted on
01/31/2010 5:58:55 PM PST
by
TankerKC
(John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt should have used LifeLock.)
To: Jet Jaguar
Seems to be more of a “logistical” merger. Less duplication of facilities/support functions, more efficiency due to economy of scale. Operationally the bases will likely remain two separate entities, just with common service/support, some of which is likely contracted out.
18
posted on
01/31/2010 6:03:47 PM PST
by
Fred Hayek
(From this point forward the Democratic Party will be referred to as the Communist Party)
To: Jedediah
19
posted on
01/31/2010 6:06:50 PM PST
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality.)
To: the invisib1e hand
DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DING!
NO more calls, please.
We have a WINNER!
20
posted on
01/31/2010 6:19:00 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson