[BufordP]

It serves as a warning that any positive remarks about Rudy McRomney on FR could be considered a banable (sp?) offense. No one can say they were not warned.

I'm waiting to see what happens when Sarah decides to endorse McCain.

[Bob J]

“I’m waiting to see what happens when Sarah decides to endorse McCain.”

Me too.

[BelegStrongbow]

It serves as a warning that any positive remarks about Rudy McRomney on FR could be considered a banable (sp?) offense. No one can say they were not warned.

I like Jim Robinson and I've been on here a while, but I cannot see that posting positive remarks should constitute grounds for being banned unless they were provably untrue. It would then be the possibility of intentionally misleading people that would constitute valid grounds. Just making a (true) positive statement grounds for being banned is, well, totalitarian.

Call me naive, but I always thought conservatives prized individual rights, including the right to free political speech.

And I'm pretty tired of seeing the ad myself. Time to load the Hucklebee version, okay?

[Peter Horry]

“It serves as a warning that any positive remarks about Rudy McRomney on FR could be considered a banable (sp?) offense. No one can say they were not warned. “

Yep people could read this and be deceived http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/01/text-of-romneys-speech-the-care-of-freedom/ lucky you are here to save them.

[NoGrayZone]

"I'm waiting to see what happens when Sarah decides to endorse McCain."

IF that were to happen, which I see no sense worrying about, she will be ousted like any other RINO.

The fact that you state "when Sarah" endorses, not "if" says all I need to know about YOU.