Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bean74

Gore Vidal doesn’t have the facts straight.

Let’s not get sidetracked by his calling the girl a hooker.

This isn’t a case of a hooker thinking she got mistreated.

This is the case of a “hooker” being under the legal age of consent.

We keep this straight, right Old Gore Vidal? I know he’s getting old, but this is too stupid.

Even if the girl was a hooker, the case is based on her being underaged.

Since when do hookers say no. Hookers say “That trick will cost you more.”


6 posted on 10/28/2009 1:59:16 PM PDT by BertWheeler (Dance and the World Dances With You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BertWheeler

She is nolt a public figure, as in politician, TV star, etc., so she has the legal rights of a private citizen.

Which means that she can sue the socks off him for libel or slander, according to what he actually said or wrote.

He is a jerk and I hope she hangs one on him.


32 posted on 10/28/2009 3:21:18 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson