Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz

I imagine that is is due to the fact that this is not a matter of statute law at all. It is a matter of Constitutional definition, and Constitutional words are not defined by statute. If they could be, we could do away with the Amendment process and just redefine select words and phrases any time we wanted to mean whatever we decided they should mean. That is decidedly NOT the case.


44 posted on 10/15/2009 12:36:36 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: John Valentine

Well, if that is the case, we can permit the nine members of the SCOTUS decide on the definition of “natural born citizen.”


45 posted on 10/15/2009 12:55:34 AM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson