It is a fairly simple statement for you to understand, Obama knows what Natural Born means, he has help to define it as it related to his opponent, and Obama know that in order to be president he must be A Natural Born citizen.
So why is it that you think he should be given a pass for refusing to admit he meets the constitutional standard for Natural Born.
Let be clear on this....
He has never stated he is Natural born.
He refers to himself as Native Born or as your wit suggests “rainbow born” (another term not found in the constitution)
He relies on third parties to present and defend a 2007 COLB created for the election process.
And you think that it doesn’t warrant a full disclosure of the facts i.e. his original Vault copy Birth certificate to once and for all time end this debate.
What's difficult for me to understand is where your three classes of citizenship are defined, either in the Constitution or in law. What you would have us believe is that Obama announced to the world that he was Constitutionally ineligible to be president, knew he was, and ran anyway.
He refers to himself as Native Born or as your wit suggests “rainbow born” (another term not found in the constitution).
My wit does tend to get the best of me at times. So in all seriousness, tell me where the difference between native born and natural born is defined - in the Constitution or in federal law?