I realize you
—are probably NOT a psychologist as I am
—have probably NOT met with 8-12 internationally famous solid serious UFO researchers on 2-3 continents.
—have probably NOT studied the topic since 1960 with anything in the same galaxy as a seriously fair-minded approach
—are probably more than a bit addicted to a TYPE II ERROR
—are probably more than a bit narrow, rigid, in perspective, attitude about such things . . .
—are probably above average in cheeky derisiveness toward folks who disagree with your construction on reality.
Well I was going to be a psychologist and was really into Jungian Psychology (I’m sure being as learned as you are you must know what he said about UFOs).
No I apparently do not have the experience you do in regards to the UFO phenomena, and don’t know what a TYPE II ERROR is.
But I must protest your implying that I am narrow and rigid about such things. As I said, when I was younger I fiercely believed that we were visited. If anything I was narrow and rigid THEN and have since become more open-minded.
My ‘cheeky derisiveness’, as you called it and if it was such, was simply turning the other ‘cheek’ in response to your rather strong response to my first comment.