Your premise is so twisted and flawed, it smacks of degenerate reasoning. Perhaps you’ve coined a new ‘discipline’: deviancy apologetics.
That was NOT my intent. My premis was simply that if things were as close as reasonably possible to being turned 180 degrees, would we feel the same way about a Christian (traditionalist) judge injecting his/her personal beliefs into the scoring, or would we applaud his/her standing up for our values.
Of course this ignores perez' hateful slander and profanity about Ms. Prejean. (That is clearly out of line and unacceptable to polite soliety and any professionally run pageant.) I am ONLY discussing the injection of personal political beliefs/values into the questioning.