LOL - best line of the entire movie!
Posted on 04/15/2009 2:04:29 PM PDT by JoeProBono
Ron Jones with CBS 13 in Sacramento has the story about a local woman who was fired from her job as a cheerleading coach after she turned up in Playboy magazine.
"The girls are supposed to look up their coaches," says one concerned parent at Casa Robles High School.
Carlie Christine bared all, all over the internet. Casa Robles High School officials in Orangevale confirm with CBS13 that their girl's cheerleading coach, Carlie Christine, was the one who posed nude in a playboy centerfold.
Christine is also Playboy's 'cyber girl of the week.'
Parents and some students, who did not want to be identified, exposed the coach to school officials after rumors started slowly getting out that she had posed nude.
"I think it's unacceptable. It's not fair," says Jamye Curtis.
What apparently uncovered the coach was when some girls didn't make the cheerleading squad because they had a few unexcused absences from school. Their parents then made copies of Christine and dropped the pictures on the principal's desk.
Heck, he distorted the charges. I saw reveal the evidence. she displays, we decide!
>> looks pretty innocent to me!
Isn’t that what you want your cheerleading coach to look like?
If I was a “school official” and I sent my recruiter out to get me a “cheerleading coach” and they came back with this one, I’d give them a bonus.
on the other hand if they brought me back (say) a Rosie O’Donnell lookalike, I’d fire them.
What am I missing here?
I'm still laughing at the sentence in the story saying the Parents and students " exposed the coach to school officials"... I think she exposed herself.. lol
I would need more evidence before I render judgement....
LOL - best line of the entire movie!
Not guilty.
So they wouldn’t have exposed her if their daughters had made the team? Is this sort of like retribution?
>> So they wouldn’t have exposed her if their daughters had made the team? Is this sort of like retribution?
Oh, it’s not “sort of like” retribution, it’s pretty much in-your-face, naked, blatant retribution!
Payback from losers.
“the photo farther up the page shows a very average looking girl.”
I think she has a very nice face and body, structurally speaking. You can airbrush away imperfections, but that only goes so far. Can’t make you pretty.
That being said, she has strange nipples.
>> the photo farther up the page shows a very average looking girl.
Your standard of what constitutes “average” female beauty is skewed because you’re from Texas, where ALL of the women possess above average looks. :-)
Yeah, in your dreams!
I admit, I didn’t look at her nipples... so you have me there.
Well that could be true - although I have to admit, I think I’ve seen more beautiful women from Georgia than any other two States combined! Do they even have ANY ugly people in Georgia? (cynthia mckinney is not included in this statement)
LOL. I agree with most posters that she is ‘smokin’ hot’ and definitely ‘not guilty.’ But... the fact that parts of her picture had to be blurred out here on our site might be an indication that her poses for Playboy do not fit with her school or community standards. I am assuming that she is a teacher, and, as such, has to abide by those standards.
Giggety...
Not guilty but we need the evidence of the case...
Pity, She’s got a pretty big “tramp stamp”. I hate those.
Based on the pictures I’ve sen, she’s no A cup.
Very Not Guilty. Can the jury take the evidence home?....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.