ping
The hair doesn’t look like much, and I don’t like the dress. On the other hand, who knows what I’d look like with unlimited money to spend ... maybe still a frump.
Her “current” hairstyle (a very simple cut, but great color) is very basic...yet you never see her doing something (anything) different stylewise. Keeping the same cut, for a premier, you would wonder why no updo; curls; etc (though she did have small, no doubt diamond, berettes in place @ the Oscars). So I am guessing she is very “exacting” (ie not changeable) in her look.
It is her money, and a nice European trip for her “people.”. I just have to question why now such an “expense account” press release? Is it a personal swipe @ Aniston (remember the Angelina needs a 20mil necklace to wear to the Oscars?). Or is it just a reference to the excess of the rich and Aniston was just an easy target?
Who knows...but she should go back to the “Rachel.”. The curved under top layer softens sharper features (I still wear a version of the Rach!)