To: Freee-dame
A huge percentage of this is the pay of the military who would be getting it even if they were still in the states preparing for action. I wish someone would breakout the incremental costs of going to war in Iraq as compared to the cost of having a standing military at home (or stationed throughout the world). I would think that at least half would be fixed costs.
To: oldbrowser; Freee-dame
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33110.pdf From the document above (page 6) it states that 94% of the funding (94% of $864billion) goes to the DOD to cover incremental war-related costs, that is, costs that are in addition to normal peacetime activities.
33 posted on
02/11/2009 9:14:48 AM PST by
avacado
(Bipartisanship is when Democrats and Republicans get together to rob the American people blind)
To: oldbrowser
I wish some Pubbie would grow a set and tell the a$$hat SIGIR chief and his paid propagandists to go to he!! then demand the same scrutiny of the bailout spending as the Dems have of a reconstruction effort in a FREAKING COMBAT ZONE.
... end of mini-rant.
34 posted on
02/11/2009 9:20:19 AM PST by
gov_bean_ counter
( Barak Obama: Pontificator in Chief and Poster Child for the Peter Principle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson