Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq Cancels Six No-Bid Oil Deals
RigZone ^ | 9/11/2008 | United Press International

Posted on 09/11/2008 9:56:40 AM PDT by fella

Iraq Cancels Six No-Bid Oil Deals United Press International 9/11/2008 URL: http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=66533

The Iraqi government said it has canceled six oil contracts with foreign companies that were awarded in June in a no-bid arrangement.

One-year contracts with Shell, Chevron, Total, BP, ExxonMobil and others, meant to increase Iraqi oil production by a 500,000 barrels a day, were canceled after Democratic U.S. senators complained the deals could interfere with Iraqi efforts to pass an energy policy law and reach a revenue-sharing agreement among Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites, The New York Times reported Thursday.

To go ahead with the no-bid contracts "would be bad for Iraq and bad for Iraqi-American relations," U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., told the Times.

The contracts were viewed as relatively small by oil-industry standards but they were seen as steps toward future contracts.

In announcing the cancellations at the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries meeting in Vienna, Austria, Iraqi Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani also said Iraq had lowered its goal of producing 2.9 million barrels a day by the end of the year by 200,000 barrels, the Times reported.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: bigoil; contracts; energy; iraq; iraqioil; nobid
were canceled after Democratic U.S. senators complained

Nuff said?

1 posted on 09/11/2008 9:56:40 AM PDT by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fella
Regardless they were no bid, therefore inherently non-competitive.

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. The Democrats on right on this one.

2 posted on 09/11/2008 10:04:11 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (The cosmos is about the smallest hole a man can stick his head in. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella
Regardless they were no bid, therefore inherently non-competitive.

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. The Democrats are right on this one.

3 posted on 09/11/2008 10:04:23 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (The cosmos is about the smallest hole a man can stick his head in. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella
"To go ahead with the no-bid contracts "would be bad for Iraq and bad for Iraqi-American relations," U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., told the Times.

IMHO...translates into the Iraqis ain't greased his skid yet!

4 posted on 09/11/2008 10:05:26 AM PDT by Devilinbaggypants (Audaces fortuna iuvat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Devilinbaggypants

Your votes have been bad for Iraq-American relationship


5 posted on 09/11/2008 10:08:03 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. The Democrats are right on this one.

I guess anytime big oils involved then there must be smoke even when there isn't a fire!

6 posted on 09/11/2008 10:11:24 AM PDT by Devilinbaggypants (Audaces fortuna iuvat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Need more information. However if Shumer is involved the alarm bells are ringing.
7 posted on 09/11/2008 10:12:36 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fella

More proof we need to change who’s in charge in Iraq.


8 posted on 09/11/2008 10:12:39 AM PDT by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Devilinbaggypants

We have made a heroine of Palin because she opposed insider deals in Alaska and put things out to bid, but it is just OK when democrats call for a transparent process in Iraq.


9 posted on 09/11/2008 10:17:44 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

The analogy is ludicrous.

Alaska is not Iraq

We have earned the right to these contracts with out blood sweat tears and dollars.

The sacrifices made on behalf of the Iraqi’s cannot be discounted.


10 posted on 09/11/2008 10:28:20 AM PDT by Carley (she's all out of caribou.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carley

What is this “we” HS. “We,” you and I are not going to derive any benefit out of this for our blood sweat and tears and our tax dollars. The beneficiaries are “Shell, Chevron, Total, BP, ExxonMobil..” They will sell oil internationally at the international market rate. Why shouldn’t they pay Iraq the going international rate for these leases established by the market through an open bidding process. First, the better able the Iraq government is to pay its way, the less we have to pay. Second, when did FREEPERS suddenly decide we don’t like open competition and free market processes and prefer insider deals buddy to buddy like the 3rd world dictators some of us claim to oppose.


11 posted on 09/11/2008 10:35:13 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fella

RATS involved. Automatically suspect. The details will come out, and I have a feeling that this will be one more nail the RATS will have pounded into their coffin.


12 posted on 09/11/2008 10:35:49 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Cure your electile dysfunction - vote Sarah-cuda! "O is for Obama, Oprah, and Over" ~polymuser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella
IIRC; these no-bid contracts were based on prewar or pre-prewar agreements between Iraq and those same producers. They were no-bid because they were essentially a resumption of earlier business.
They were also quite small and of benefit primarily as a starting point for future negotiations, awards, etc.

That our congressional democrats can kill such business - beyond our shores & following years of US / Iraqi efforts to restore Iraq - admits to a shadow government & foreign policy opposing that of our elected government.
These SAME democrats are currently faulting GWB for not forcing Iraq to act like a real government - but when they do so, who cried foul?

13 posted on 09/11/2008 10:42:44 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Regardless they were no bid, therefore inherently non-competitive.

the Iraqi government is NOT the U.S. Where else are we supposed to bid for 500,000 barrels of oil? Venezuela and the Hugo (CITGO Inc)? This will assist in bolstering their ecomomy even more and it is only a year contract.

We have to take competitive bidding because we have other areas and U.S. Companies that can compete outside of the Oil market. Why is the Demon Congress trying to throw their weight on other Countries?.. They haven't done a thing in the U.S. to fix our Oil dependence

14 posted on 09/11/2008 10:44:07 AM PDT by jmpmstr4u2 (43 muscles to frown, 7 to smile and 4 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fella
One-year contracts with Shell, Chevron, Total, BP, ExxonMobil
and others, meant to increase Iraqi oil production by a 500,000 barrels
a day, were canceled after Democratic U.S. senators complained the
deals could interfere with Iraqi efforts to pass an energy policy law...


Overheard (probably) at the US Capitol:
"LOL! We've aborted that 'Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less' mantra
in a SECOND country! Yippee!!! Call the Sierra Club and Greenpeace
and tell they we expect the negotiated 'donations' to be hitting
our accounts PRONTO!!!"

OK, as non-competitive, the contracts should be canceled.

But that's just a fig leaf for those Democratic Senators to
cover their real objective. To screw with energy production.
Whereever they want to.
And to justify donations from envirowingnuts.
15 posted on 09/11/2008 10:56:15 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson