Skip to comments.
Obama isn’t eligible to be President
TIW ^
| 6/10/2008
| Bruce Tyson
Posted on 06/11/2008 6:25:31 PM PDT by Neville72
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
1
posted on
06/11/2008 6:28:28 PM PDT
by
Neville72
To: Neville72
2
posted on
06/11/2008 6:33:44 PM PDT
by
Keith Brown
(Among the other evils being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised Machiavelli.)
To: Neville72
This is the kind of stupidity that will disparage anything bloggers say. There is no doubt that Barak Obama is a natural born U.S. citizen. To say otherwise, or even to insinuate otherwise, sounds about as paranoid and irrational as the “truthers”.
Does anyone really want to sound as paranoid and irrational as them?
To: Neville72
But do you honestly think that a lawsuit about this would fly? I would like to think so, but I doubt too much within our judicial system to think they would care about a silly thing like our Constitution.
To: Neville72
Democrats don’t care about rules.
If this is true, and if Obama is not eligible, according to the rules, the Democrats will not care. And if someone (the Supreme Court?) tells the Democrats “Rules must be followed. You have to care. It’s over” …
Well … our cities will burn.
5
posted on
06/11/2008 6:36:01 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Et si omnes ego non)
To: Neville72
6
posted on
06/11/2008 6:36:12 PM PDT
by
Invictus
(Can't see out of one eye, and can't hear out of the other... In this upcoming election, that is GOOD)
To: Neville72
Attention to legendx3, Hillary wants to bear your child!
7
posted on
06/11/2008 6:36:27 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(I tried to explain that I meant it as a compliment, but that only appears to have made things worse.)
To: Neville72
You really may be on to something here!
Call Fox News and they will invite you to be on with Bill O’Reilly where you can make a fool of yourself in front of millions.
8
posted on
06/11/2008 6:36:47 PM PDT
by
trumandogz
("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
9
posted on
06/11/2008 6:36:55 PM PDT
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
thank you for saying that. I wanted to but thought I would be labeled a troll.
I think if he was ineligible to be US President then this would have been discovered ... you know like around 2004, when he first became senator, because even then we knew he’d run.
10
posted on
06/11/2008 6:37:05 PM PDT
by
merry10
To: Neville72
Could the same have been said of Barry Goldwater? He was born in Arizona before it became a state ... at that time it was just a territory ... it became a state in 1912 and he was born before that ...
11
posted on
06/11/2008 6:37:31 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
("I Believe In The Law Until It Interferes With Justice")
To: Neville72
It would be a good idea to have those running for office submit their birth certificate, so it can be examined for authenticity. That is only prudent, given the times in which we live.
To: Neville72
As I understand it, he was born in Hawaii when Hawaii was a state. Thus, under the SCOTUS view of the 14th Amendment, doesn't that automatically made him a natural born citizen? Indeed, wouldn't the noted details only apply if he hadn't been born in the U.S.? I'm not against raising this argument against him; I just want it to be solid. Thus, my questions.
To: Neville72
If a Mexican drops a baby in Texas and it is a citizen, I guess his mama dropping him in Hawaii will qualify him too.
14
posted on
06/11/2008 6:37:44 PM PDT
by
libbylu
To: Neville72
Di! Di! Dih!
Dah! Dah! Dah!
Di! Di! Dih!
S.O.S. HELP!
15
posted on
06/11/2008 6:38:28 PM PDT
by
Young Werther
(Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
To: figgers3036
Well, “if” this is true (and I’m a bit dubious) then a complaint would have to be filed with the FEC and a Lawsuit started to determine the facts of the matter.
The “10 and 5” rule is new to me, it sounds like post 1966 Immigration Law about “Anchor Babies”.
16
posted on
06/11/2008 6:39:14 PM PDT
by
padre35
(Conservative in Exile/ The Obamao v Mad Jon, win the battle and lose the war..choice of evils be..)
To: merry10
You would think that one of his opponents from either party would have raised this issue if they thought there was anything to it.
17
posted on
06/11/2008 6:39:32 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(I miss the days when only the politicians were unethical.)
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
How is following the law stupid?
18
posted on
06/11/2008 6:39:47 PM PDT
by
BamaGirl
(If I give Obama 76 cents will he stop clamoring for change?)
To: ClearCase_guy
That may be fine, depending which cities that might be.
19
posted on
06/11/2008 6:39:49 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Keith Brown
“Is this for real?”
No, but it is about the thirteenth thread on this subject.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson