Run the numbers anyway. With an original p of 0.67 for the one data set, there’s probably a good chance that p will still exceed 0.05.
I did. In my previous post, I told you that that four of the 125 data slices (one of them being the one you picked) show a statistically significant upward trend at the 95% confidence level (I didn't look for negative trends). That means P<=0.05 for those four only.
By random chance, we would expect that 6 would show a statistically significant trend by random chance. Of those 3, on average would be negative and three would be positive. So the fact that only four show a significant upward trend means that the upward trends found were most likely, random fluctuations due to picking the most favorable possible look at the data.