Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Balding_Eagle; DogandPonyShow

Four feet below standards is not meeting the standards. And if four feet higher still allows a tiger to get out, obviously those were also not safe enough standards.

Unless you think the point of caging a wild animal isn’t to keep it caged.


175 posted on 01/05/2008 11:27:42 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: nicmarlo

Zoos are a trade-off between keeping to animal in a specific area, away from being able to harm the public.

AND

The public, meanwhile, want to see the animal as closely as possible. Some want to do from the ‘safety’ of their car, others want to touch the animal, even at the risk of minor injury.

All the definitions are always in a certain amount of flux, including the definition of ‘safely’.

No one want to ‘see’ the zoo animal at 100% foolproof zero risk, because that means the 50 foot solid walls I’m talking about may not be enough.


176 posted on 01/05/2008 11:39:21 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: nicmarlo

There aren’t “standards” ...

There are “recommendations”.


182 posted on 01/05/2008 11:46:02 AM PST by FredHead47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson