L
Posted on 10/05/2007 3:39:13 PM PDT by processing please hold
This report hopes to assist in protecting the right of the people to keep and bare arms, individually and collectively, for the safety of the individual, and for the safety of the nation. There are certain fundamental laws and principles over which public officials have no authority to alter or to deny--not even if they profess to have acquired the 'consent of the governed'. In this case, prohibiting possession and use of arms is not possible, because those rights which have been endowed upon man by the Creator are unalienable, and nor revocable by mankind. The purpose of this report is to show how 'consent of the governed' has become abused, and how government officials in the lead state with the help of change agents had set out to destroy the essential and unalienable right of the people to keep and bare arms, by setting into motion unauthorized and unlawful procedures and then pretend that they operated under the 'consent of the governed'.
(Excerpt) Read more at libertygunrights.com ...
We, the U.S., signed a treaty in 1997 with the un called, Inter-American Convention--http://disarmament.un.org/TreatyStatus.nsf
The un has an arm to it called, UNIDIR (united nations institute for disarmament research) that's a lexicon for arms control.
Are any of you aware that our second amendment can be handed over to the un?
The last paragraph of a report.[snip]
Concluding Observations
While U.N. bodies have adopted resolutions and a “firearms protocol,” these efforts have focused on the availability of firearms manufactured and obtained illegally and on the use or misuse of these firearms in the criminal arena, including for organized crime, and/or to facilitate the spread of or prolongation of conflict. During meetings and negotiations in U.N. bodies, U.S. representatives have focused on the need to combat organized crime and to reduce out-of-control violence and conflict by limiting the availability of firearms, light weapons, and small arms that contribute to and aggravate these situations. They have made it clear that the reduction of crime and conflict is a primary goal of the United States. They have supported U.S. Second Amendment rights of citizens to firearms. As the experience with the OAS Convention and the U.N. Protocol illustrates, anyinternational treaties in this areawould not bind theUnited States unless these documents were acted on favorably by the U.S. Senate, if the President decided to transmit the treaty to the Senate for its consideration.
Now, if I'm reading that wrong would someone please set me straight. Complete article HERE
I found the site I posted from as I was looking for more information on unidir.
Now, back to the article. Is anyone aware of page 340 in the Master Set. Apparently Richard Lugar and Arlen Specter were on the committee responsible for page 340. It's an unlawful directive according to the article.
Arrrrrrrrggggghhh. Edit, don't just spellcheck.
Mark for later reading. Looks good.
We’re wild pigs, gettin’ some free corn, watching the fence get built.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1899897/posts
L
It's just like the guy who refuses to brush his teeth whining about how inevitable it is that they will rot in his mouth.
Sorry about that, the editing part. ;)
Thanks, bookmarked for later reading.
A waste and disgrace.
I am so sorry I missed that. Bear not bare. lol
I agree. It is pathetic. Get on your knees now.
There is not a damn thing that is inevitable except for death.
As long as I have basic chemicals and the knowledge to combine them.
As long as I love freedom and have the will to defend it.
I can NOT be disarmed.
I, of course, have never made any error in my time on FR!
;)
Bear; I can hardly afford to bare it anymore.
I can NOT be disarmed.
To which I will add,
Molon Labe!
lolol I'm sure by now I've made enough errors to print a coffee table book. :)
I have written that phrase so many times, keep and bear arms, I'm ashamed I didn't catch it. lol
I try to bare as little as possible theses days, Father Time is a cruel cruel thing. lol
I will not be disarmed ... period. They will have to kill me.
Sheesh!
Spelling and grammar are weak points when your enemies want to portray you as inbred hillbillies.
Such allies are sometimes worse than enemies.
One needs only draw a line in the sand and say, this it it, no more. To take our guns would be that line in the sand for many Americans.
But what about the article?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.