To: Daffynition
So, Brian “Jumps to Conclusions to Support My Own Pre-Determined Bias” Brawdy - can we pretty much assume that when they finally get through the murky water and start pulling bodies out of cars, that none of them will be wearing seatbelts?
3 posted on
08/03/2007 9:16:38 AM PDT by
Hegemony Cricket
(You can take the boy out of the country, but you just can't get the smell off his shoes.)
To: Hegemony Cricket
Hydra Spyder ... with a 502 Cubic Inch Corvette LS2 Gen Iv engine ...I'm all set.
6 posted on
08/03/2007 9:29:50 AM PDT by
Daffynition
(The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear.)
To: Hegemony Cricket
can we pretty much assume that when they finally get through the murky water and start pulling bodies out of cars, that none of them will be wearing seatbelts? No, but it's a darn fine chance that each person who did escape from their car after it hit the water was wearing their seatbelt. It's a logical fallacy to assume that if x=y then z=/=y.
Those who both wear seatbelts and those who do not wear seatbelts die in accidents such as this. Those who wear seatbelts have a dramatically improved chance to survive accidents such as this.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson