Posted on 01/14/2007 9:35:17 AM PST by MotleyGirl70
LOS ANGELES Mike Buday isn't married to his last name. In fact, he and his fiancee decided before they wed that he would take hers. But Buday was stunned to learn that he couldn't simply become Mike Bijon when they married in 2005.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Mike and Diana Buday
Guess We know who wears the pants in that marriage.
This guy is a complete wuss.
fiance: "you will TAKE my last name!"
girly man: "yes dear"
I always do a search and I did for this story and nothing came up. FRs search feature is less than perfect.
He should hypenate it - and add "wussy" as the other half.
Girly man...Lol!
metro sexual = lavender shirt = Prime Time wussy
Then he found out he would have to pay about $300 to complete the process and decided to sue the state of California to force them to let him change his name for free like they allow newly married women to do.
It was his second marriage - already had two sons by his first wife. His new wife was an only child and her father was also an only child.
They did it to keep her family name alive.
Everyone was happy.
You mean I can shorten my name by marrying a woman with a name like Lee? Oh the time it would save. /S
Could the name change be because he had skeletons to hide from his past?
Don't you know the posting gestapo will find you now matter how innocent your transgression? ;)
Don't you know the posting gestapo will find you now matter how innocent your transgression? ;)
now = no, I better change this before the grammar police show up. lol
ABP...but it was fun the last time. Some re-runs are entertaining.
:-)
Buday? Isn't that one of those deals that shoots water up your butt? I might concider getting rid of that name too!
Fine by me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.