To: Toddsterpatriot
One good drama queen deserves another?I really don't think that any of Corsi's columns have a "drama queen" tone to them. In fact, I'm impressed that Corsi has remanined as calm as he has. I would have already gone the route of calling Medved a "fag" or something if I was slandered as much as Corsi has been.
How do you prove there is no conspiracy?
You obviously cannot, but as I mentioned earlier, there are freepers, yourself included, who do a much better job at picking apart the Corsi articles than Medved has. Folks like me, who reject both extreme sides of this debate and feel that the truth is somewhere out there in the middle, are turned off by what a bitch Medved is being.
20 posted on
01/09/2007 10:59:31 AM PST by
jmc813
(Go Jets!)
To: jmc813
I would have already gone the route of calling Medved a "fag" or somethingThere are no pixies in the garden. Well, maybe your garden.
21 posted on
01/09/2007 11:06:08 AM PST by
PRND21
To: jmc813
I really don't think that any of Corsi's columns have a "drama queen" tone to them.President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
North American Union to Replace USA?
Is this a little drama queeny?
29 posted on
01/09/2007 12:25:04 PM PST by
Toddsterpatriot
(There is no cause so right that one cannot find a fool following it.)
To: jmc813; Toddsterpatriot
but as I mentioned earlier, there are freepers, yourself included, who do a much better job at picking apart the Corsi articles than Medved has.
I think you are mistaken. They also use sophomoric insults and I have yet to see any of them pick apart an argument. They change the argument whenever possible, usually to insult the character of a poster.
Their argument for 'free trade' for example. They get on a thread and demand "YOU'RE FOR FREE TRADE,AREN'T YOU"? as in free and trade, rather than the falsely named "free trade" fiasco that has been imposed on the American people.
Next they'll demand "YOU'RE FOR CHEAPER PRICES, AREN'T YOU"? like getting goods produced by slaves is a good thing.
Then, finally, when its pointed out that the falsely named "free trade" has caused our federal government to blow up to an unimaginably dangerous size, and that they are buying globalization with taxpayer money in the third world, and that "free trade" is, in part, a wealth redistribution system, they say OUR ECONOMY IS SO HUGE WHATEVER WE GIVE AWAY TO THOSE POOR HELPLESS COUNTRIES IS JUST A PITTANCE AND DON'T YOU WANT THEM TO HAVE MONEY AND MAKE $0.30 AN HOUR? They never acknowledging that "free trade" is theft of taxpayer money, where the public has no influence, but foreign governments, foreign agents, and transnational corporations have all the authority where they should have NONE over American domestic politics, policy or our independence.
Nope, they don't pick apart an argument, they just cough up a lot of nonsense.
41 posted on
01/09/2007 9:23:25 PM PST by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson