[1rudeboy]

I'll pass-on a question I've been pondering. Do they cite (indirectly, in the case here) to E.P.I. because there is such a paucity of material provided by their own intellectual comrades? I mean, it's pretty clear that here we are dealing with then Buchanan/Schlafly (let's leave Perot out of this for now) segment of the movement. Where is its analytical guiding-light? Is it Tonelson? But even Tonelson simply repeats what he reads elsewhere.

Is that why some on that side feel they must attack such giants as (Milton) Friedman, and re-write the Reagan legacy? Because they have nothing to offer otherwise?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Do they cite (indirectly, in the case here) to E.P.I. because there is such a paucity of material provided by their own intellectual comrades?

I think they know we're doomed. Then they search for people who agree with them. They only find agreement on the far left and the nut-job right.

If they could link to respectable sources, they would. If they held reasonable positions, they could.