So, the AfricanhyphenatedAmerican "community" is trashing one of their own in order to save face.
How perfect.
And how would there be punishment for something "not committed"? In his context, the good reverend uses "committed" in reference to a crime, so why would there be punishment for a crime not committed?
This guy is a pastor? They're usually better educated than this. What a dumbass. I guess he was trying to sound erudite and profound, wise and lofty, blah blah blah. Instead he sounds like a bag of hot air with one foot in his mouth and the other pumping the wheel of a grinder with a few too many axes waiting in line.
I really don't know what the hell he meant, other than he's hoping his congregation is even dumber than he is and buys into his fallacious BS.
I would be interested in what you actually thought he was getting at... What I thought when I first read the statement was... They may not have committed a crime, but they should be punished for what they did do....
I'm wondering if he is only referring to the males involved? You get 3 guesses...
Not always. Some denominations do not require much of an education for someone to become a pastor.
Sounds like the "as long as a white boy pays" mentality.